Prognostic Implications of Asymptomatic Ventricular Arrhythmias: The Framingham Heart Study
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the prevalence and prognostic significance of asymptomatic complex or frequent ventricular premature beats detected during ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. Design Cohort study with a follow-up period of 4 to 6 years. Setting Population-based. Participants Surviving patients of the original Framingham Heart Study cohort and offspring of original cohort members (2727 men and 3306 women). Measurements One-hour ambulatory electrocardiography. Results The age-adjusted prevalence of complex or frequent arrhythmia (more than 30 ventricular premature complexes per hour or multiform premature complexes, ventricular couplets, ventricular tachycardia, or R-on-T ventricular premature complexes) was 12% (95% Cl, 11% to 13%) in the 2425 men without clinically evident coronary heart disease and 33% (Cl, 24% to 42%) in the 302 men with coronary heart disease. The corresponding values in women (3064 without disease and 242 with disease) were 12% (Cl, 11% to 13%) and 26% (Cl, 9% to 43%). After adjusting for age and traditional risk factors for coronary heart disease in a Cox proportional hazards model, men without coronary heart disease who had complex or frequent ventricular arrhythmias were at increased risk for both all-cause mortality (relative risk, 2.30; Cl, 1.65 to 3.20) and the occurrence of myocardial infarction or death from coronary heart disease (relative risk, 2.12; Cl, 1.33 to 3.38). In men with coronary heart disease and in women with and w…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmia is associated with increased mortality in the general population.
“however asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmia is associated with increased mortality in the general population.16”
From Ventricular Arrhythmia and Cardiac Fibrosis in Endurance Experienced Athletes (VENTOUX) (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 45 · Cited by 266
- Authors
- Bikkina, M., Larson, M. G., & Levy, D.
- Affiliations
- Framingham Heart Study (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1992-12-15
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 990-996
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2043957700
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Keywords
- asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmia, premature ventricular contractions, ventricular tachycardia, Holter monitoring, coronary artery disease, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, sex differences, Framingham Heart Study, arrhythmia prevalence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Coronary Disease, Cardiac Complexes, Premature, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Sex Factors, Statistics as Topic, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Prevalence, Survival Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review