Fluconazole Compared with Ketoconazole for the Treatment of Candida Esophagitis in AIDS: A Randomized Trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and endoscopic response of candida esophagitis to antifungal therapy and to compare the two oral antifungal agents, fluconazole and ketoconazole. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial. SETTING: Fifteen U.S. centers including university, private practice, and county hospital settings. PATIENTS: A total of 169 patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS); odynophagia, dysphagia, or retrosternal pain; white esophageal plaques at endoscopy; and pseudohyphae on esophageal brushings or biopsies. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to fluconazole (100 mg/d) or ketoconazole (200 mg/d). Doses were doubled at week 1 or 2 if no symptomatic improvement had occurred during the preceding week. Therapy was continued for 2 weeks after resolution of symptoms or for a maximum of 8 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were clinically evaluated weekly, and laboratory tests were done every 2 weeks. Endoscopy was repeated within 5 days after the end of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were clinically evaluable (assessed within 7 days after therapy), and 129 patients were endoscopically evaluable (endoscopy repeated after therapy). Endoscopic cure occurred in 91% of patients treated with fluconazole and in 52% of those given ketoconazole for a difference of 39% (95% Cl, 24% to 52%; P less than 0.001). Esophageal symptoms resolved in 85% of fluconazole-treated patients and in 65% of ketoconazole-treated patients for a difference of 20% (Cl, 6% to 34%; P = 0.006). Intention-to-treat analyses also yielded statistically significant differences for the comparisons listed above. Side effects were minimal and comparable in the two groups; only one patient in each group had therapy discontinued for adverse effects that were possibly related to the study medications. CONCLUSIONS: Fluconazole is associated with significantly greater rates of endoscopic and clinical cure than ketoconazole in patients with AIDS and candida esophagitis. Both drugs appear to be safe and well tolerated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluconazole is superior to ketoconazole, itraconazole capsules, and flucytosine for treatment of esophageal candidiasis.
“Fluconazole is superior to ketoconazole, itraconazole capsules, and flucytosine for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis [278][279][280].”
From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [278]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 131
- Authors
- Laine, L., Dretler, R. H., Conteas, C. N., Tuazon, C., Koster, F. M., Sattler, F., Squires, K., & Islam, M. Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1992-10-15
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 655-660
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2059903398
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal and GI Pathology
- Keywords
- esophageal candidiasis, AIDS, fluconazole, ketoconazole, oral antifungal therapy, esophageal symptoms, odynophagia, dysphagia, antifungal drug comparison
- MeSH terms
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Adult, Candidiasis, Double-Blind Method, Esophagitis, Esophagoscopy, Female, Humans, Ketoconazole, Male, Fluconazole
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review