The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of Intensive Diabetes Therapy on the Development and Progression of Neuropathy
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether intensive therapy designed to achieve glycemic levels as close to normal as possible prevents or slows the progression of neuropathy when compared with conventional therapy in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: 29 U.S. and Canadian clinical centers. PARTICIPANTS: 1441 patients aged 13 to 39 years, of whom 726 had had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus for 1 to 5 years and had no retinopathy at baseline (primary prevention cohort); 715 had had diabetes for 1 to 15 years and had minimal to moderate nonproliferative retinopathy at baseline (secondary intervention cohort). INTERVENTION: Intensive therapy with three or more daily insulin injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion guided by four or more glucose tests per day compared with conventional therapy with one or two daily insulin injections. RESULTS: Intensive therapy reduced the development of confirmed clinical neuropathy (defined as a history or physical examination consistent with clinical neuropathy confirmed by either abnormal nerve conduction or autonomic nervous system testing) by 64% (95% CI, 45% to 76%) in the combined cohorts after 5 years of follow-up (5% of the intensive therapy group compared with 13% of the conventional therapy group). The prevalence of abnormal nerve conduction and abnormal autonomic nervous system function were reduced by 44% (CI, 34% to 53%) and 53% (CI, 24% to 70%), respectively (26% of the intensive treatment group developed abnormal nerve conduction compared with 46% of the conventional treatment group; 4% of the intensive treatment group had abnormal autonomic nervous system function compared with 9% of the conventional treatment group). Finally, nerve conduction velocities generally remained stable with intensive therapy but decreased significantly with conventional therapy. CONCLUSION: Intensive diabetes therapy markedly delays or prevents the development of clinically manifest diabetic polyneuropathy as confirmed by objective nerve function testing in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Poor control, defined as a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level >9.0%, contributes to complications, including nephropathy [1-6], retinopathy [4,7], and neuropathy [4,8].”
From An Assessment of How Clinicians and Staff Members Use a Diabetes Artificial Intelligence Prediction Tool: Mixed Methods Study (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“In the DCCT/EDIC trial of type 1 DM, intensive diabetes therapy led to a dramatic reduction in DPN and its progression (78% relative risk reduction).13”
From Glucose time in range and peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vascular risk factors and diabetic neuropathy
Tesfaye, S., Chaturvedi, N., Eaton, S. E. M., Ward, J. D., Manes, C., Ionescu-Tirgoviste, C., Witte, D. R., & Fuller, J. H. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032782 · Cited by 1,323
Writing Team for the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.16.2159 · Cited by 1,009
Effect of intensive therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus
The Writing Team for the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.287.19.2563 · Cited by 941
Boulton, A. J. M., Malik, R. A., Arezzo, J. C., & Sosenko, J. M. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.6.1458 · Cited by 913
R�sen, P., Nawroth, P., King, G. L., M�ller, W., Tritschler, H., & Packer, L. (2001) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.196 · Cited by 890
Metadata
- Authors
- The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group.
- Corresponding author
- The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1995-04-15
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 561-568
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W4245107010
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Keywords
- intensive diabetes therapy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic polyneuropathy, type 1 diabetes, glycemic control, insulin pump therapy, multiple daily insulin injections, nerve conduction velocity, autonomic dysfunction, neuropathy prevention, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetic Neuropathies, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infusion Pumps, Insulin Infusion Systems, Neural Conduction, Patient Compliance, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review