Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 757

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Starting Age of Physical Activity on Bone Mass in the Dominant Arm of Tennis and Squash Players

Kannus, Pekka, Haapasalo, Heidi, Sankelo, Marja, Sievanen, Harri, Pasanen, Matti, Heinonen, Ari, Oja, Pekka, Vuori, Ilkka·1995·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine in female tennis and squash players the effect of biological age (that is, the starting age of playing relative to the age at menarche) at which tennis or squash playing was started on the difference in bone mineral content between the playing and non-playing arms. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Finnish tennis and squash federations. PARTICIPANTS: 105 female Finnish national-level players and 50 healthy female controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in bone mineral content in playing and nonplaying (dominant to nondominant) arms (proximal humerus, humeral shaft, radial shaft, and distal radius) were compared in the players and controls and among six groups of players. Players were divided into groups according to the biological age (years before or after menarche) at which their playing careers began: more than 5 years before; 3 to 5 years before; 2 to 0 years before; 1 to 5 years after; 6 to 15 years after; and more than 15 years after. RESULTS: Compared with controls (whose mean +/- SD differences in bone mineral content were 4.6% +/- 4.6%, 3.2% +/- 2.3%, 3.2% +/- 3.8%, and 3.9% +/- 4.3% at the previously noted anatomical sites), the players had a significantly (P < 0.001) larger side-to-side difference in every measured site (15.5% +/- 8.4%, 16.2% +/- 9.8%, 8.5% +/- 6.6, and 12.5% +/- 7.1%). Among players, the group differences in bone mineral content were significant (P < 0.001 to P = 0.005), with the group means clearly decreasing with increasing starting biological age of playing. The difference was two to four times greater in the players who had started their playing careers before or at menarche (lowest mean difference in bone mineral content, 10.5% +/- 7.2%; highest difference, 23.5% +/- 7.2%) than in those who started more than 15 years after menarche (lowest difference, 2.4% +/- 4.8%; highest difference, 9.6% +/- 4.9%). Adjustment for potential confounding factors (age and height) did not change these trends. CONCLUSIONS: Bones of the playing extremity clearly benefit from active tennis and squash training, which increases their mineral mass. The benefit of playing is about two times greater if females start playing at or before menarche rather than after it. The minimal level and minimum number of years of activity necessary to produce these results, the extent to which this benefit is sustained after cessation of intensive training, and the degree to which these results can be extended to other forms of physical activity and other bone sites should be studied further.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-123-1-199507010-00003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 757

Metadata

Authors
Kannus, P., Haapasalo, H., Sankelo, M., Sievanen, H., Pasanen, M., Heinonen, A., Oja, P., & Vuori, I.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1995-07-01
Volume
123
Issue
1
Pages
27-31
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1974660743
Cited by
757
References
1
FWCI
14.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.