Cited by 445Child Abuse and TraumaPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsIntimate Partner and Family Violence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Sexual and Physical Abuse and Gastrointestinal Illness: Review and Recommendations

Drossman, Douglas A., Talley, Nicholas J., Leserman, Jane, Olden, Kevin W., Barreiro, Marcelo A.·1995·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Objectives To summarize the existing data on abuse history and gastrointestinal illness, suggest a conceptual scheme to explain these associations, suggest ways to identify patients at risk, and provide information about mental health referral. Data sources Review of the pertinent literature by clinicians and investigators at referral centers who are involved in the care of patients with complex gastrointestinal illness and who have experience in the diagnosis and care of patients with abuse history in these settings. Study selection All research articles and observational data that addressed abuse history in gastroenterologic settings. Articles were identified through a MEDLINE search. Data extraction Independent extraction by multiple observers. Data synthesis On the basis of literature review and consensus, it was determined that abuse history is associated with gastrointestinal illness and psychological disturbance; appears more often among women, patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders, and patients seen in referral settings; is not usually known by the physician; and is associated with poorer adjustment to illness and adverse health outcome. Although the mechanisms for this association are unknown, psychological factors (somatization, response bias, reinforcement of abnormal illness behavior) and physiologic factors (psychophysiologic response, enhanced visceral sensitivity) probably contribute. On the basis of these data, recommendations are made on how to…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-123-10-199511150-00007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 445

Metadata

Authors
Drossman, D. A., Talley, N. J., Leserman, J., Olden, K. W., & Barreiro, M. A.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Drossman, Douglas A.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1995-11-15
Volume
123
Issue
10
Pages
782-794
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2058906926
Cited by
445
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
FWCI
22.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
abuse history, sexual abuse, physical abuse, gastrointestinal diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, somatization, visceral sensitivity, mental health referral, risk identification, women, adaptation to illness, adverse health effects
MeSH terms
Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Male, Medical History Taking, Mental Health, Referral and Consultation, Risk Factors, Self-Help Groups, Sex Offenses, Domestic Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review