Cited by 365Dermatology and Skin DiseasesLiver Diseases and ImmunityNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Effects of Naloxone Infusions in Patients with the Pruritus of Cholestasis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Abstract

Objective To determine whether endogenous opioids contribute to the pruritus of cholestasis by studying the effect of the opiate antagonist naloxone on the perception of pruritus and on scratching activity in patients with this form of pruritus. Design Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with four periods. Setting Clinical research referral center. Patients 29 pruritic patients with liver diseases of various causes. Intervention Each patient received as many as two naloxone and two placebo solution infusions consecutively in random order. Each infusion lasted 24 hours. Measurements During the infusions, visual analog scores of pruritus were recorded every 4 hours while patients were awake; scratching activity independent of limb movements was recorded continuously. Results One patient had a mild reaction consistent with a naloxone-precipitated syndrome similar to opiate withdrawal. A significant 24-hour rhythm of scratching activity was seen in 7 of 11 patients for whom complete 96-hour data were collected. The mean of a visual analog score of the perception of pruritus (maximum, 10.0) recorded during naloxone infusions was 0.582 lower than that recorded during placebo infusions (95% CI, 0.176 to 0.988; P Conclusions Naloxone administration is associated with amelioration of the perception of pruritus and reduction of scratching activity in cholestatic patients. Because of the opioid receptor specificity of the action of naloxone, these findings support the hypo…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-123-3-199508010-00001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 365

Metadata

Authors
Bergasa, N. V., Alling, D. W., Talbot, T. L., Swain, M. G., Yurdaydin, C., Turner, M. L., Schmitt, J. M., Walker, E. C., & Jones, E. A.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • From the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1995-08-01
Volume
123
Issue
3
Pages
161-167
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2046254173
Cited by
365
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
naloxone, endogenous opioids, opioid antagonism, scratching behavior, cholestatic liver disease, opioid withdrawal
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cholestasis, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Naloxone, Pruritus, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Naloxone Infusions in Patients with the Pruritus of Cholestasis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-123-3-199508010-00001
The paper
Bergasa, N. V., Alling, D. W., Talbot, T. L., Swain, M. G., Yurdaydin, C., Turner, M. L., Schmitt, J. M., Walker, E. C., & Jones, E. A. (1995). Effects of Naloxone Infusions in Patients with the Pruritus of Cholestasis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-123-3-199508010-00001