The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
CLINICAL GUIDELINE: Diagnosing Syncope: Part 2: Unexplained Syncope
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review the literature on diagnostic testing in syncope that remains unexplained after initial clinical assessment. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search. STUDY SELECTION: Published papers were selected if they addressed diagnostic testing in syncope, near syncope, or dizziness. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were identified as population studies, referral studies, or case series. DATA SYNTHESIS: After a thorough history, physical examination, and electrocardiography, the cause of syncope remains undiagnosed in 50% of patients. In such patients, information may be derived from the results of carefully selected diagnostic tests, especially 1) electrophysiologic studies in patients with organic heart disease, 2) Holter monitoring or telemetry in patients known to have or suspected of having heart disease, 3) loop monitoring in patients with frequent events and normal hearts, 4) psychiatric evaluation in patients with frequent events and no injury, and 5) tilt-table testing in patients who have infrequent events or in whom vasovagal syncope is suspected. Hospitalization is indicated for high-risk patients, especially those with known heart disease and elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: A flexible, focused approach is required to diagnose syncope. Features of the initial history and physical examination help guide diagnostic testing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In an overview of eight studies, including 625 patients with syncope undergoing EPS, 209 positive results occurred predominantly in patients with structural heart disease.”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [209]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 111 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Linzer, M., Yang, E. H., Estes, N. A. M., Wang, P., Vorperian, V. R., & Kapoor, W. N.
- Affiliations
- Tufts Medical Center (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Linzer, Mark
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-86
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W1965720068
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- syncope, unexplained syncope, diagnostic testing, electrophysiological study, Holter monitoring, psychiatric assessment, tilt table test, vasovagal syncope, heart disease, dizziness, presyncope, hospitalization
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Echocardiography, Electrophysiology, Exercise Test, Heart Diseases, Humans, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Syncope, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Tilt-Table Test
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CLINICAL GUIDELINE: Diagnosing Syncope: Part 2: Unexplained Syncope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00014
- The paper
- Linzer, M., Yang, E. H., Estes, N. A. M., Wang, P., Vorperian, V. R., & Kapoor, W. N. (1997). CLINICAL GUIDELINE: Diagnosing Syncope: Part 2: Unexplained Syncope. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00014