Cited by 313Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersVestibular and auditory disordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

CLINICAL GUIDELINE: Diagnosing Syncope: Part 2: Unexplained Syncope

Linzer, Mark, Yang, Eric H., Estes, N.A. Mark, Wang, Paul, Vorperian, Vicken R., Kapoor, Wishwa N.·1997·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the literature on diagnostic testing in syncope that remains unexplained after initial clinical assessment. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search. STUDY SELECTION: Published papers were selected if they addressed diagnostic testing in syncope, near syncope, or dizziness. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were identified as population studies, referral studies, or case series. DATA SYNTHESIS: After a thorough history, physical examination, and electrocardiography, the cause of syncope remains undiagnosed in 50% of patients. In such patients, information may be derived from the results of carefully selected diagnostic tests, especially 1) electrophysiologic studies in patients with organic heart disease, 2) Holter monitoring or telemetry in patients known to have or suspected of having heart disease, 3) loop monitoring in patients with frequent events and normal hearts, 4) psychiatric evaluation in patients with frequent events and no injury, and 5) tilt-table testing in patients who have infrequent events or in whom vasovagal syncope is suspected. Hospitalization is indicated for high-risk patients, especially those with known heart disease and elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: A flexible, focused approach is required to diagnose syncope. Features of the initial history and physical examination help guide diagnostic testing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 111 · Cited by 313

Metadata

Authors
Linzer, M., Yang, E. H., Estes, N. A. M., Wang, P., Vorperian, V. R., & Kapoor, W. N.
Affiliations
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Linzer, Mark
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
127
Issue
1
Pages
76-86
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1965720068
Cited by
313
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
syncope, unexplained syncope, diagnostic testing, electrophysiological study, Holter monitoring, psychiatric assessment, tilt table test, vasovagal syncope, heart disease, dizziness, presyncope, hospitalization
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Echocardiography, Electrophysiology, Exercise Test, Heart Diseases, Humans, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Syncope, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Tilt-Table Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CLINICAL GUIDELINE: Diagnosing Syncope: Part 2: Unexplained Syncope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00014
The paper
Linzer, M., Yang, E. H., Estes, N. A. M., Wang, P., Vorperian, V. R., & Kapoor, W. N. (1997). CLINICAL GUIDELINE: Diagnosing Syncope: Part 2: Unexplained Syncope. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00014