The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flock Worker's Lung: Chronic Interstitial Lung Disease in the Nylon Flocking Industry
Abstract
Background Two young men working at a nylon flocking plant in Rhode Island developed interstitial lung disease of unknown cause. Similar clusters at the same company's Canadian plant were reported previously. Objective To define the extent, clinicopathologic features, and potential causes of the apparent disease outbreak. Design Case-finding survey and retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic occupational medicine program. Patients All workers employed at the Rhode Island plant on or after 15 June 1990. Measurements Symptomatic employees had chest radiography, pulmonary function tests, high-resolution computed tomography, and serologic testing. Those with unexplained radiographic or pulmonary function abnormalities underwent bronchoalveolar lavage, lung biopsy, or both. The case definition of "flock worker's lung" required histologic evidence of interstitial lung disease (or lavage evidence of lung inflammation) not explained by another condition. Results Eight cases of flock worker's lung were identified at the Rhode Island plant. Three cases were characterized by a high proportion of eosinophils (25% to 40%) in lavage fluid. Six of the seven patients who had biopsy had histologic findings of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, and the seventh had bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. All seven of these patients had peribronchovascular interstitial lymphoid nodules, usually with germinal centers, and most had lymphocytic bronchiolitis and interstitial fibrosis.…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The types of MP found, i.e. nylon varieties have been associated with human respiratory diseases, including granulomatous lesions in lungs of workers exposed occupationally to nylon, polyester and acrylic fiber dusts (Pimentel, Avila, and Lourenco 1975); and chronic lung diseases including a rare lung interstitial disease (Flock worker's lung) is observed in nylon textile workers (Kern et al. 1998”
From Microplastics and nanoplastics science: collecting and characterizing airborne microplastics in fine particulate matter (2021) · cites this paper as Kern et al. 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Presence of airborne microplastics in human lung tissue
Amato-Lourenço, L. F., Carvalho-Oliveira, R., Júnior, G. R., dos Santos Galvão, L., Ando, R. A., & Mauad, T. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126124 · Cited by 1,329
Microplastic and plastic pollution: impact on respiratory disease and health
Vasse, G. F., & Melgert, B. N. (2024) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/16000617.0226-2023 · Cited by 146
Rahman, L., Mallach, G., Kulka, R., & Halappanavar, S. (2021) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.1080/17435390.2021.2018065 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Kern, D. G., Crausman, R. S., Durand, K. T. H., Nayer, A., & Kuhn III, C.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1998-08-15
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 261-272
- ISSN
- 0003-4819
- 1539-3704
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review