Cited by 150

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Flock Worker's Lung: Chronic Interstitial Lung Disease in the Nylon Flocking Industry

Kern, David G., Crausman, Robert S., Durand, Kate T.H., Nayer, Ali, Kuhn III, Charles·1998·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Two young men working at a nylon flocking plant in Rhode Island developed interstitial lung disease of unknown cause. Similar clusters at the same company's Canadian plant were reported previously. Objective To define the extent, clinicopathologic features, and potential causes of the apparent disease outbreak. Design Case-finding survey and retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic occupational medicine program. Patients All workers employed at the Rhode Island plant on or after 15 June 1990. Measurements Symptomatic employees had chest radiography, pulmonary function tests, high-resolution computed tomography, and serologic testing. Those with unexplained radiographic or pulmonary function abnormalities underwent bronchoalveolar lavage, lung biopsy, or both. The case definition of "flock worker's lung" required histologic evidence of interstitial lung disease (or lavage evidence of lung inflammation) not explained by another condition. Results Eight cases of flock worker's lung were identified at the Rhode Island plant. Three cases were characterized by a high proportion of eosinophils (25% to 40%) in lavage fluid. Six of the seven patients who had biopsy had histologic findings of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, and the seventh had bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. All seven of these patients had peribronchovascular interstitial lymphoid nodules, usually with germinal centers, and most had lymphocytic bronchiolitis and interstitial fibrosis.…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-129-4-199808150-00001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kern, D. G., Crausman, R. S., Durand, K. T. H., Nayer, A., & Kuhn III, C.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1998-08-15
Volume
129
Issue
4
Pages
261-272
ISSN
  • 0003-4819
  • 1539-3704
Cited by
150
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review