CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 261Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesOcular Infections and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prophylactic Fluconazole in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Winston, Drew J., Pakrasi, Anita, Busuttil, Ronald W.·1999·Annals of Internal Medicine
DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-131-10-199911160-00003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among persons who receive solid organ transplants, liver transplant recipients have the highest incidence of invasive fungal infection; however, no antifungal prophylaxis has been proven to be effective. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic fluconazole in liver transplant recipients. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: University-affiliated transplantation center. PATIENTS: 212 liver transplant recipients who received fluconazole (400 mg/d) or placebo until 10 weeks after transplantation. MEASUREMENTS: Fungal colonization, proven superficial or invasive fungal infection, drug-related side effects, and death. RESULTS: Fungal colonization increased in patients who received placebo (from 60% to 90%) but decreased in patients who received fluconazole (from 70% to 28%). Proven fungal infection occurred in 45 of 104 placebo recipients (43%) but in only 10 of 108 fluconazole recipients (9%) (P < 0.001). Fluconazole prevented both superficial infection (29 of 104 placebo recipients became infected [28%] compared with 4 of 108 fluconazole recipients [4%]; P < 0.001) and invasive infection (24 of 104 placebo recipients became infected [23%] compared with 6 of 108 fluconazole recipients [6%]; P < 0.001). Fluconazole prevented infection by most Candida species, except C. glabrata. However, infection and colonization by organisms intrinsically resistant to fluconazole did not seem to increase. Fluconazole was not associated with any hepatotoxicity. Patients receiving fluconazole had higher serum cyclosporine levels and more adverse neurologic events (headaches, tremors, or seizures in 13 fluconazole recipients compared with 3 placebo recipients; P = 0.01). Although the overall mortality rate was similar in both groups (12 of 108 [11%] in the fluconazole group compared with 15 of 104 [14%] in the placebo group; P > 0.2), fewer deaths related to invasive fungal infection were seen in the fluconazole group (2 of 108 patients [2%]) than in the placebo group (13 of 104 patients [13%]) (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic fluconazole after liver transplantation decreases fungal colonization, prevents superficial and invasive fungal infections, and has no appreciable hepatotoxicity. Although fluconazole prophylaxis is associated with fewer deaths from fungal infection, it does not improve overall survival. Patients receiving prophylactic fluconazole require close monitoring of serum cyclosporine levels to avoid neurologic toxicity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-131-10-199911160-00003

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Tortorano AM, 1995, British Journal of Mycology and Medicine, 5, 21
  2. Mora NP, 1992, Transplant Proc, 24, 154

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–261 of 261

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Winston, D. J., Pakrasi, A., & Busuttil, R. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
ORCID
Busuttil, Ronald W.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Publisher
American College of Physicians
Published
1999-11-16
Volume
131
Issue
10
Pages
729-737
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
DOI
10.7326/0003-4819-131-10-199911160-00003
OpenAlex
W2061748969
Cited by
261
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
fluconazole, antifungal prophylaxis, liver transplantation, invasive fungal infections, fungal colonization, Candida, cyclosporine, drug interactions, neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antifungal Agents, Female, Headache, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mycoses, Postoperative Complications, Seizures, Tremor, Fluconazole, Proportional Hazards Models, Liver Transplantation, Cyclosporine, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review