Cited by 279Healthcare Quality and ManagementHealth Policy Implementation SciencePrimary Care and Health Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Creating the Evidence Base for Quality Improvement Collaboratives

Mittman, Brian S.·2004·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Intensive efforts are under way to improve health care quality and safety throughout the United States and abroad. Many of these efforts use the quality improvement collaborative method, an approach emphasizing collaborative learning and exchange of insights and support among a set of health care organizations. Unfortunately, the widespread acceptance and reliance on this approach are based not on solid evidence but on shared beliefs and anecdotal affirmations that may overstate the actual effectiveness of the method. More effective use of the collaborative method will require a commitment by users, researchers, and other stakeholders to rigorous, objective evaluation and the creation of a valid, useful knowledge and evidence base. Development of this evidence base will require improved conceptions of the nature of quality problems, quality improvement processes, and the types of research needed to elucidate these processes. Researchers, journal editors, and funding agencies must also cooperate to ensure that published evaluations are relevant, comprehensive, and cumulative.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 279

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mills PD, 2004, Jt Comm J Qual Saf, 30, 152
  2. Wilson T, 2003, Jt Comm J Qual Saf, 29, 85
  3. Weeks WB, 2001, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, 27, 243

Metadata

Authors
Mittman, B. S.
Affiliations
Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (US)
Corresponding author
Mittman, Brian S.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
140
Issue
11
Pages
897-901
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2170767429
Cited by
279
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
45.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
quality improvement collaborative, evidence base, quality of care, patient safety, cooperative learning, research needs, knowledge translation, stakeholder engagement
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Quality of Health Care, United States, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Creating the Evidence Base for Quality Improvement Collaboratives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00011
The paper
Mittman, B. S. (2004). Creating the Evidence Base for Quality Improvement Collaboratives. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00011