The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-Analysis: The Effect of Steroids on Survival and Shock during Sepsis Depends on the Dose
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses demonstrated that high-dose glucocorticoids were not beneficial in sepsis. Recently, lower-dose glucocorticoids have been studied. PURPOSE: To compare recent trials of glucocorticoids for sepsis with previous glucocorticoid trials. DATA SOURCES: Systematic MEDLINE search for studies published between 1988 and 2003. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials of sepsis that examined the effects of glucocorticoids on survival or vasopressor requirements. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently collected data on patient and study characteristics, treatment interventions, and outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 5 included trials revealed a consistent and beneficial effect of glucocorticoids on survival (I2 = 0%; relative benefit, 1.23, [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.50]; P = 0.036) and shock reversal (I2 = 0%; relative benefit, 1.71 [CI, 1.29 to 2.26]; P < 0.001). These effects were the same regardless of adrenal function. In contrast, 8 trials published before 1989 demonstrated a survival disadvantage with steroid treatment (I2 = 14%; relative benefit, 0.89 [CI, 0.82 to 0.97]; P = 0.008). In comparison with the earlier trials, the more recent trials administered steroids later after patients met enrollment criteria (median, 23 hours vs. <2 hours; P = 0.02), for longer courses (6 days vs. 1 day; P = 0.01), and in lower total dosages (hydrocortisone equivalents, 1209 mg vs. 23 975 mg; P = 0.01) to patients with higher control group mortality rates (mean, 57% vs. 34%; P = 0.06) who were more likely to be vasopressor-dependent (100% vs. 65%; P = 0.03). The relationship between steroid dose and survival was linear, characterized by benefit at low doses and increasing harm at higher doses (P = 0.02). LIMITATIONS: We could not analyze time-related improvements in medical care and potential bias secondary to nonreporting of negative study results. CONCLUSIONS: Although short courses of high-dose glucocorticoids decreased survival during sepsis, a 5- to 7-day course of physiologic hydrocortisone doses with subsequent tapering increases survival rate and shock reversal in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001616 · Cited by 3,718
Annane, D. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.8.1038 · Cited by 1,000 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, Annane and colleagues (21) demonstrated that a high cortisol level and an attenuated response to corticotropin stimulation indicate relative adrenal insuffiReview”
BackgroundEpidemiology of sepsis: an update
Angus, D. C., & Wax, R. S. (2001) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-200107001-00035 · Cited by 813
Cited by
Marik, P. E., Pastores, S. M., Annane, D., Meduri, G. U., Sprung, C. L., Arlt, W., Keh, D., Briegel, J., Beishuizen, A., Dimopoulou, I., et al. (2008) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31817603ba · Cited by 912
Septic Shock and Sepsis: A Comparison of Total and Free Plasma Cortisol Levels
Ho, J. T., Al-Musalhi, H., Chapman, M. J., Quach, T., Thomas, P. D., Bagley, C. J., Lewis, J. G., & Torpy, D. J. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0265 · Cited by 312
Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency
Marik, P. E. (2009) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.08-1149 · Cited by 299
Acute secondary adrenal insufficiency after traumatic brain injury: a prospective study
Cohan, P., Wang, C., McArthur, D. L., Cook, S. W., Dusick, J. R., Armin, B., Swerdloff, R., Vespa, P., Muizelaar, J. P., Cryer, H. G., et al. (2005) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000181735.51183.a7 · Cited by 282
Munhoz, C. D., Sorrells, S. F., Caso, J. R., Scavone, C., & Sapolsky, R. M. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0303-09.2010 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Minneci, P. C., Deans, K. J., Banks, S. M., Eichacker, P. Q., & Natanson, C.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2004-07-06
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-56
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2107348946
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 27.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-Analysis: The Effect of Steroids on Survival and Shock during Sepsis Depends on the Dose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-141-1-200407060-00014
- The paper
- Minneci, P. C., Deans, K. J., Banks, S. M., Eichacker, P. Q., & Natanson, C. (2004). Meta-Analysis: The Effect of Steroids on Survival and Shock during Sepsis Depends on the Dose. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-1-200407060-00014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.