Cited by 32Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareThoreau and American Literature

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the Informed Consent Process

Abstract

Letters7 December 2004The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the Informed Consent ProcessPeter Breese, MSPH, William Burman, MD, Cornelis Rietmeijer, MD, PhD, and Dennis Lezotte, PhDPeter Breese, MSPHFrom Denver Public Health and the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80204., William Burman, MDFrom Denver Public Health and the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80204., Cornelis Rietmeijer, MD, PhDFrom Denver Public Health and the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80204., and Dennis Lezotte, PhDFrom Denver Public Health and the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80204.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-11-200412070-00034 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail TO THE EDITOR:Background: The informed consent documents required in clinical studies have become longer and more complex, and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) recently added another component to the process. HIPAA requires that research participants sign an authorization form detailing the "protected health information" to be collected in the study and the persons and entities that may have access to that information. To assess the potential effect of HIPAA on the informed consent process, we evaluated the readability and length of locally ap…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-141-11-200412070-00034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1056/NEJM199707243370411 · DOI
  2. 10.1056/NEJMsa021212 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Breese, P., Burman, W., Rietmeijer, C., & Lezotte, D.
Affiliations
Denver Public Health (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2004-12-07
Volume
141
Issue
11
Pages
897-898
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2049256251
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Thoreau and American Literature
Keywords
HIPAA, informed consent, authorization forms, protected health information, readability, informed consent forms, clinical research participants, health information privacy, patient literacy, informed consent process, HIPAA Privacy Rule
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Informed Consent, Records, United States, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review