The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the Informed Consent Process
Abstract
Letters7 December 2004The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the Informed Consent ProcessPeter Breese, MSPH, William Burman, MD, Cornelis Rietmeijer, MD, PhD, and Dennis Lezotte, PhDPeter Breese, MSPHFrom Denver Public Health and the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80204., William Burman, MDFrom Denver Public Health and the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80204., Cornelis Rietmeijer, MD, PhDFrom Denver Public Health and the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80204., and Dennis Lezotte, PhDFrom Denver Public Health and the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80204.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-11-200412070-00034 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail TO THE EDITOR:Background: The informed consent documents required in clinical studies have become longer and more complex, and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) recently added another component to the process. HIPAA requires that research participants sign an authorization form detailing the "protected health information" to be collected in the study and the persons and entities that may have access to that information. To assess the potential effect of HIPAA on the informed consent process, we evaluated the readability and length of locally ap…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Empirical research has amply shown that consent forms are too long and written at too high a grade level (1, 4,19,29, 76, 84, 85, 105, 106, 125)”
From Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens (2016) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“Empirical research has amply shown that consent forms are too long and written at too high a grade level (1, 4,19,29, 76, 84, 85, 105, 106, 125)”
From Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens (2016) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Harnessing the Power of Clinical Decision Support Systems: Challenges and Opportunities
Chen, Z., Liang, N., Zhang, H., Li, H., Yang, Y., Zong, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Shi, N. (2023) · Open Heart · doi:10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432 · Cited by 244
Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens
Beskow, L. M. (2016) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022536 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Breese, P., Burman, W., Rietmeijer, C., & Lezotte, D.
- Affiliations
- Denver Public Health (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2004-12-07
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 897-898
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2049256251
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Thoreau and American Literature
- Keywords
- HIPAA, informed consent, authorization forms, protected health information, readability, informed consent forms, clinical research participants, health information privacy, patient literacy, informed consent process, HIPAA Privacy Rule
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Informed Consent, Records, United States, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review