Cited by 146Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsElectronic Health Records SystemsHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Computerization Can Create Safety Hazards: A Bar-Coding Near Miss

McDonald, Clement J.·2006·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Increasing numbers of hospitals are implementing bar-coding systems to prevent errors in patient identification. In the present case, a diabetic patient admitted to a teaching hospital was mistakenly given the bar-coded identification wristband of another patient who was admitted at the same time. When a laboratory result that documented the diabetic patient's severe hyperglycemia was entered into the other patient's electronic medical record, the latter patient seemed to have a very high glucose level and was almost given what could have been a fatal dose of insulin. This near miss shows that computer systems, although having the potential to improve safety, may create new kinds of errors if not accompanied by well-designed, well-implemented cross-check processes and a culture of safety. Moreover, computer systems may have the pernicious effect of weakening human vigilance, removing an important safety protection. Researchers should continue to study real-world implementation of computerized systems to understand their benefits and potential harms, and administrators and providers should seek ways to anticipate these harms and mitigate them.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 146

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Grannis SJ, 2002, Proc AMIA Symp, 305
  2. Larrabee S, 2003, Jt Comm J Qual Saf, 29, 345
  3. 2005, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 33
  4. Levick D, 2005, JAMA, 294, 179
  5. 10.1001/jama.1993.03500030077036 · DOI
  6. McDonald CJ, 1986, MD Computing, 3, 8

Metadata

Authors
McDonald, C. J.
Affiliations
Regenstrief Institute (US)
Corresponding author
McDonald, Clement J.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2006-04-04
Volume
144
Issue
7
Pages
510-516
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2039229720
Cited by
146
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
24.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine (G08LM008232)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Keywords
barcoding, patient identification errors, near misses, electronic health records, computerized systems, patient safety, safety culture, insulin dosing errors, hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Electronic Data Processing, Patient Care, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Male, Medication Errors, Patient Identification Systems, United States, Medical Records Systems, Computerized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review