Cited by 1Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone health and treatmentsMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Review of Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments to Prevent Fractures

MacLean, Catherine, Maglione, Margaret, Suttorp, Marika·2008·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Letters3 June 2008Review of Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments to Prevent FracturesCatherine MacLean, MD, PhD, Margaret Maglione, MPP, and Marika Suttorp, MSCatherine MacLean, MD, PhDFrom RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90401.Search for more papers by this author, Margaret Maglione, MPPFrom RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90401.Search for more papers by this author, and Marika Suttorp, MSFrom RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90401.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00021 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail IN RESPONSE:Dr. Rosen is correct. The study he references (1) was included in our analysis but was not called out in the section on renal insufficiency. This trial reported the effect of risedronate on fractures among participants with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. This study, which combined data from 9 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, reported a reduced incidence of vertebral fractures with risedronate compared with placebo in participants with severe, moderate, and mild renal insufficiency.Although not reported in our paper, we did collect data and calculate pooled estimates for all adverse events reported in all studies reviewed. Details ...References1. Miller PD, Roux C, Boonen S, Barton IP, Dunlap LE, Burgio DE. Safety and efficacy of ris…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.1359/JBMR.050817 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000137349.79204.b8 · DOI
  3. 10.1001/jama.295.23.joc60074 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.3310/hta9220 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
MacLean, C., Maglione, M., & Suttorp, M.
Affiliations
RAND Corporation (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2008-06-03
Volume
148
Issue
11
Pages
887
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2063985786
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
fracture prevention, osteoporosis, comparative effectiveness, risedronate, renal failure, vertebral fractures, bisphosphonates, adverse events, osteopenia, men and women, drug safety, fracture risk assessment tools, patient-centered decision-making, health care costs, health care utilization, quality of life, patient satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review