Cited by 129Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationResearch Data Management Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Toward Reuse of Clinical Data for Research and Quality Improvement: The End of the Beginning?

Weiner, Mark G., Embi, Peter J.·2009·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Editorials1 September 2009Toward Reuse of Clinical Data for Research and Quality Improvement: The End of the Beginning?FREEMark G. Weiner, MD and Peter J. Embi, MD, MSMark G. Weiner, MDFrom University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267. and Peter J. Embi, MD, MSFrom University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00141 SectionsAboutVisual AbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Today's health information technology (HIT) landscape provides an unprecedented convergence of comprehensive electronic health records, robust computational processing power, data-sharing capabilities, and emerging financial incentives that favor the widespread adoption and meaningful use of such systems. Even as the primary value proposition for HIT adoption by clinical practices remains a matter of debate (1), 2 articles in this issue (2, 3) help to illustrate the potential for secondary benefits by discussing the value of distributed health data networks for improving research and health care quality.The multiple goals of population health, pharmaceutical surveillance, comparative effectiveness research, and other major initiatives being advanced to address the needs of our health care and research enterprises have create…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00141

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 129

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1056/NEJMp0901592 · DOI
  2. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00139 · DOI
  3. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00140 · DOI
  4. 10.1197/jamia.M2997 · DOI
  5. Adler-Milstein J, 2008, Health Aff (Millwood), 27, w60
  6. Johnson SB, 1994, Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care, 281
  7. Steib SA, 1995, Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care, 62
  8. 10.1002/sim.4780100406 · DOI
  9. 10.7326/0003-4819-111-9-751 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/sim.4780100415 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/sim.4780100417 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/sim.4780100404 · DOI
  13. 10.1197/jamia.M2273 · DOI
  14. 10.1136/bmj.b81 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Weiner, M. G., & Embi, P. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • From University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267.
Corresponding author
Weiner, Mark G.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2009-09-01
Volume
151
Issue
5
Pages
359-360
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2006872004
Cited by
129
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5ul1rr026314-03, UL1TR000077)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (5r18hs017099-02)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM009533, 1-R01-LM-009533-01A1)
  • National Center for Research Resources (1UL1 RR-026314-01, UL1RR024134, 1-UL1-RR-024134-04)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
clinical data reuse, electronic health records, health information technology, healthcare quality improvement, health care research, data sharing, population health, comparative effectiveness research, pharmacovigilance, health data repositories, meaningful use, health care costs
MeSH terms
Health Services Research, Medical Records Systems, Computerized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review