The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of combination therapy and monotherapy for dyslipidemia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Statin therapy effectively prevents vascular disease, but treatment targets are often not achieved. PURPOSE: To compare the benefits and harms of high-dose statin monotherapy with those of combination therapy in adults at high risk for coronary disease. DATA SOURCES: English-language records from MEDLINE (1966 to 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009), and the Cochrane Library (third quarter of 2008). STUDY SELECTION: A reviewer screened records, and a second reviewer verified selection of randomized, controlled trials in adult patients that compared combinations of statins and bile-acid sequestrants, fibrates, ezetimibe, niacin, or omega-3 fatty acids with statin monotherapy, as well as nonrandomized comparative studies that were longer than 24 weeks and reported clinical and harms outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were abstracted for studies by using standardized forms, and study quality was rated with a standardized scale and strength of evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. DATA SYNTHESIS: 102 studies met eligibility criteria. The main analysis compared combination therapy with high-dose statin monotherapy in high-risk patients. Very-low-strength evidence showed that statin-ezetimibe (2 trials; n = 439) and statin-fibrate (1 trial; n = 166) combinations did not reduce mortality more than high-dose statin monotherapy. No trials compared the effect of combination therapy versus high-dose statin monotherapy on the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularization procedures. Two statin-ezetimibe trials (n = 295) demonstrated higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment with combination therapy (odds ratio, 7.21 [95% CI, 4.30 to 12.08]). Trials in lower-risk patients did not show a difference in mortality. LIMITATIONS: Studies were generally short, focused on surrogate outcomes, and were heterogeneous in the sample's risk for coronary disease. Few studies examined treatment combinations other than statin-ezetimibe. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence suggests that combinations of lipid-lowering agents do not improve clinical outcomes more than high-dose statin monotherapy. Very-low-quality evidence favors statin-ezetimibe treatment for attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Because the four drug classes described above (fibrates, niacin, n-3 fatty acids, and statins) have different underlying mechanisms in reducing triglyceride levels, as well as correcting other associated dyslipidemias, there is a considerable potential for use of drug combinations based on complementary mechanisms (169, 186).”
From Evaluation and Treatment of Hypertriglyceridemia: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline (2012) · cites this paper as [186]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 115 · Cited by 79
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Miniño AM, 2006, Natl Vital Stat Rep, 54, 1
- Rodney RA, 2006, J Natl Med Assoc, 98, 772
- Hong H, 2004, Chin Med Sci J, 19, 145
- Nordøy A, 2001, Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 11, 7
- Ismail F, 1990, Clin Ther, 12, 427
- Johansson J, 1995, Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 5, 39
- Shah HD, 2007, Exp Clin Cardiol, 12, 91
- Mol MJ, 1990, Neth J Med, 36, 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, M., Ansari, M. T., Abou-Setta, A. M., Soares-Weiser, K., Ooi, T. C., Sears, M., Yazdi, F., Tsertsvadze, A., & Moher, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- From the University of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; and Enhance Reviews, Kfar-Saba, Israel.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2009-11-03
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 622-630
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2153535950
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- U.S. Public Health Service (290-02-0021)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
- Keywords
- statin monotherapy, combination lipid-lowering therapy, ezetimibe, fibrates, bile acid sequestrants, nicotinic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, LDL cholesterol goal attainment, cardiovascular mortality, coronary disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization
- MeSH terms
- Anticholesteremic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Mortality, Risk Factors, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Dyslipidemias, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review