The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Guidance Statements of the American College of Physicians: Summary of Methods
Abstract
The American College of Physicians (ACP) established its evidence-based clinical practice guidelines program in 1981. The ACP's Guidelines Committee and the staff of the Clinical Programs and Quality of Care Department develop the clinical recommendations. The ACP develops 2 different types of clinical recommendations: clinical practice guidelines and clinical guidance statements. The ACP clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements follow a multistep development process that includes a systematic review of the evidence, deliberation of the evidence by the committee, summary recommendations, and evidence and recommendation grading. All ACP clinical practice guidelines and clinical guidance statements, if not updated, are considered automatically withdrawn or invalid 5 years after publication or once an update has been issued.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Clinical recommendations were graded according to the ACP grading system for evidence and recommendations (7) (see Table 1).”
From Guidelines for the Treatment of Hypothyroidism: Prepared by the American Thyroid Association Task Force on Thyroid Hormone Replacement (2014) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Owens, D. K., Shekelle, P., & for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- American College of Physicians (US)
- Corresponding author
- Qaseem, Amir
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2010-08-03
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 194-199
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2147359506
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- guideline development, evidence-based medicine, level of evidence
- MeSH terms
- Financial Support, Methods, Organizational Objectives, Societies, Medical, United States, Conflict of Interest, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Peer Review, Research, Evidence-Based Medicine, Advisory Committees, Information Dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review