Cited by 258Acute Kidney Injury ResearchChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Fibrate Use and Acute Renal Outcomes in Elderly Adults: A Population-Based Study

Open access
Zhao, Ying Y., Weir, Matthew A., Manno, Michael, Cordy, Peter, Gomes, Tara, Hackam, Daniel G., Juurlink, David N., Mamdani, Muhammad, Moist, Louise, Parikh, Chirag R., Paterson, J. Michael, Wald, Ron, Yao, Zhan, Garg, Amit X.·2012·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background: Fibric acid derivatives (fibrates) have been shown to increase serum creatinine level in randomized trials. Objective: To assess renal outcomes in elderly adults within 90 days of a new fibrate prescription. Design: Population-based cohort study. Setting: Ontario, Canada. Patients: Patients aged 66 years or older with a new outpatient prescription for a fibrate or ezetimibe (comparator drug) between January 2004 and December 2008. Measurements: Hospitalization for an increase in serum creatinine level (primary outcome) and consultation with a nephrologist, receipt of dialysis for severe acute kidney injury, all-cause mortality, and increases in serum creatinine level (secondary outcomes). All outcomes were assessed within 90 days of a new prescription for ezetimibe or a fibrate. Results: Compared with ezetimibe users (n = 61 831), fibrate users (n = 19 072) were more likely to be hospitalized for an increase in serum creatinine level (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.7 to 3.3]) and were more likely to consult a nephrologist (absolute risk difference, 0.15% [CI, 0.01% to 0.29%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.3 [CI, 1.0 to 1.6]). There were no differences between groups in the risk for all-cause mortality or receiving dialysis for severe acute kidney injury. In a subpopulation of 1110 patients (fibrates, n = 220; ezetimibe, n = 890), 9.1% of fibrate users and 0.3% of ezetimibe users had an increase in serum creatinine level of 50% or more (absolute difference, 8.8% [CI, 4.5% to 13.1%]; odds ratio, 29.6 [CI, 8.7 to 100.5]). Risks were greater among fibrate users with chronic kidney disease. Limitations: Because hospitalizations for an increase in serum creatinine level were underestimated, absolute differences may be misleading. Most patients (91%) were prescribed fenofibrate. Serum creatinine levels were measured as part of routine care and were not available for everyone or at predefined times. Conclusion: New fibrate use in elderly adults was associated with an increase in serum creatinine level and a small 90-day absolute increase in hospitalizations and nephrologist consultations. There was no detectable effect on dialysis for severe acute kidney injury or on mortality. The mechanism and clinical significance of the increase in serum creatinine level with fibrates is unclear. Primary Funding Source: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Drug Innovation Fund.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-156-8-201204170-00401

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1016/S0272-6386(04)00832-7 · DOI
  2. Hottelart C, 1999, Nephrologie, 20, 41
  3. Lipscombe J, 2001, Clin Nephrol, 55, 39
  4. Levy AR, 2003, Can J Clin Pharmacol, 10, 67
  5. Mamdani MM, 2001, CMAJ, 164, 1695
  6. Tu K, 2003, CMAJ, 168, 553

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, Y. Y., Weir, M. A., Manno, M., Cordy, P., Gomes, T., Hackam, D. G., Juurlink, D. N., Mamdani, M., Moist, L., Parikh, C. R., Paterson, J. M., Wald, R., Yao, Z., & Garg, A. X.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Ying Y.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2012-04-17
Volume
156
Issue
8
Pages
560-569
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2144286150
Cited by
258
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 28
FWCI
40.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA012197)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
fibrates, ezetimibe, acute kidney injury, creatinine elevation, older adults, drug safety, fenofibrate, chronic kidney disease, nephrology consultation, dialysis, all-cause mortality, hypertriglyceridemia, statin-sparing therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, hospitalization risk, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Staging, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Prostatic Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Disease Progression, Patient Selection, Digital Rectal Examination, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Watchful Waiting, Neoplasm Grading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review