Cited by 212Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePrimary Care and Health OutcomesPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patient-Centered Decision Making and Health Care Outcomes: An Observational Study

Abstract

Background Patient-centered decision making (PCDM) is the process of identifying clinically relevant, patient-specific circumstances and behaviors to formulate a contextually appropriate care plan. Objective To ascertain whether encounters in which PCDM occurs are followed by improved health care outcomes compared with encounters where there is inattention to patient context. Design Patients surreptitiously audio-recorded encounters with their physicians. Medical records of these encounters were then screened for "contextual red flags," such as deteriorating self-management of a chronic condition, that could reflect such underlying contextual factors as competing responsibilities or loss of social support. When a contextual factor was identified, either as a result of physician questioning or because a patient volunteered information, physicians were scored on the basis of whether they adapted the care plan to it. Setting Internal medicine clinics at 2 Veterans Affairs facilities. Participants 774 patients audio-recorded encounters with 139 resident physicians. Measurements Individualized outcome measures were based on the contextual red flag, such as improved blood pressure control in a patient presenting with hypertension and loss of medication coverage. Outcome coders were blinded to physician performance. Results Among 548 contextual red flags, 208 contextual factors were confirmed, either when physicians probed or patients volunteered information. Physician attention to…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30261.x · DOI
  2. Weiner SJ, 2004, ACP J Club, 141, A11, 10.7326/ACPJC-2004-141-3-A11 · DOI
  3. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000832 · DOI
  4. 10.1001/jama.2010.1297 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/0272989X07306113 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00092-0 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s11606-010-1496-5 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.020 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00012-5 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s11606-012-2221-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weiner, S. J., Schwartz, A., Sharma, G., Binns-Calvey, A., Ashley, N., Kelly, B., Dayal, A., Patel, S., Weaver, F. M., & Harris, I.
Affiliations
  • Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US)
  • From Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois; and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2013-04-16
Volume
158
Issue
8
Pages
573-579
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2067627650
Cited by
212
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11
FWCI
38.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Annals of Internal Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
patient-centered decision-making, physician-patient encounters, chronic disease self-management, prescription drug coverage, blood pressure control, medical residents, veterans, health care outcomes
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans, Internal Medicine, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Care Planning, Patient Compliance, Patient Participation, Patients, Primary Health Care, Social Support, Health Behavior, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Patient-Centered Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review