Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 607

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Resistance to Tuberculosis: Experimental Studies in Native and Acquired Defensive Mechanisms.

·1965·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

It is indeed a privilege to read the life's work of an extremely competent investigator. This is the case with respect to Max Lurie's work, Resistance to Tuberculosis. The book is written in a most logical, clear and concise fashion. Each series of experiments follows one another as carefully planned building blocks to a most logical conclusion. It is difficult to "put this book down" as the reading is so fluid and experiments defined with such clarity that their significance is very easily grasped. Certainly this book gives not only tremendous insight into the mechanisms involved in resistance to tuberculosis but an insight into integral body mechanisms of defense as a whole. I feel that this book is one of the major contributions in its field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-63-1-156_2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 607

Metadata

Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1965-07-01
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
156-157
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1418984735
Cited by
607
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resistance to Tuberculosis: Experimental Studies in Native and Acquired Defensive Mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-63-1-156_2
The paper
Resistance to Tuberculosis: Experimental Studies in Native and Acquired Defensive Mechanisms. (1965). Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-63-1-156_2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.