The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radiobiology for the Radiologist.
Abstract
Radiobiology for the radiologist , Radiobiology for the radiologist , کتابخانه دیجیتال جندی شاپور اهواز
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Ciccia, A., & Elledge, S. J. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 · Cited by 4,368
Tumor Hypoxia: Definitions and Current Clinical, Biologic, and Molecular Aspects
Hockel, M., & Vaupel, P. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.4.266 · Cited by 2,662
ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer
Srinivas, U. S., Tan, B. W. Q., Vellayappan, B. A., & Jeyasekharan, A. D. (2019) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2018.101084 · Cited by 2,144
Stewart, F. A., Akleyev, A. V., Hauer-Jensen, M., Hendry, J. H., Kleiman, N. J., MacVittie, T. J., Aleman, B. M., Edgar, A. B., Mabuchi, K., Muirhead, C. R., et al. (2012) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001 · Cited by 1,604
The impact of O2 availability on human cancer
Bertout, J. A., Patel, S. A., & Simon, M. C. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2540 · Cited by 1,365
Metadata
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1974-03-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 438-438
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2149884878
- Cited by
- 3,484
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiobiology for the Radiologist. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-80-3-438_1
- The paper
- Radiobiology for the Radiologist. (1974). Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-80-3-438_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
