Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Manual of Clinical Microbiology.

·1975·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Excerpt The field of clinical microbiology has recently seen a striking renewal of interest in re-evaluation of time-honored procedures and development of many new, standardized diagnostic techniques. Much of the impetus for this development stems from the American Society for Microbiology through its programs to upgrade technical and professional skills, and through publications such as this. No doubt some diagnostic laboratories have been slow to adapt to change. The publication of this presently definitive working manual should stimulate all to thoroughly review and up-date their procedures. This second edition represent a significant improvement over its predecessor. The new version is about...

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-82-5-730_1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1975-05-01
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
730-730
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W4292901888
Cited by
469
References
0
FWCI
24.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manual of Clinical Microbiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-82-5-730_1
The paper
Manual of Clinical Microbiology. (1975). Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-82-5-730_1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.