The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacteroides fragilis Subspecies in Clinical Isolates
Abstract
Isolates of Bacteroides fragilis from 83 infected patients were collected during 2 years. Of 103 isolates, 68% were subspecies fragilis. This was the single most common subspecies isolated from blood (12/17), intra-abdominal (11/28), wound (17/20), perirectal (11/16), pelvic (6/10), and other (8/11) sites. Sixteen patients had B. fragilis isolated in pure culture. Of these, 9/12 blood cultures and 4/4 cultures from other sites were ss. fragilis. The recent observation that ss. fragilis organisms are encapsulated whereas the other subspecies are generally unencapsulated was supported by indirect fluorescent antibody studies using antibodies prepared to the capsular material of ss. fragilis. All 33 strains of ss. fragilis and none of 13 strains of other subspecies were positive. The predominance of ss. fragilis in clinical isolates compared to its relative infrequency in normal fecal flora and its predominance in pure cultures, especially of blood, indicate that this is the most virulent of B. fragilis subspecies. This virulence may be related to encapsulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gut Microbiota is Altered in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease
Zhuang, Z.-Q., Shen, L.-L., Li, W.-W., Fu, X., Zeng, F., Gui, L., Lü, Y., Cai, M., Zhu, C., Tan, Y.-L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-180176 · Cited by 885
Intestinal Bacterial Colonization Induces Mutualistic Regulatory T Cell Responses
Geuking, M. B., Cahenzli, J., Lawson, M. A. E., Ng, D. C. K., Slack, E., Hapfelmeier, S., McCoy, K. D., & Macpherson, A. J. (2011) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.021 · Cited by 840
Pathogenicity Islands in BacterialPathogenesis
Schmidt, H., & Hensel, M. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.17.1.14-56.2004 · Cited by 776
An insider's perspective: Bacteroides as a window into the microbiome
Wexler, A. G., & Goodman, A. L. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.26 · Cited by 641
Bacteroides fragilis subverts mucosal biology: from symbiont to colon carcinogenesis
Sears, C. L., Geis, A. L., & Housseau, F. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci72334 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- POLK, B. F., & KASPER, D. L.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1977-05-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 569-571
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2057454595
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteroides fragilis Subspecies in Clinical Isolates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-86-5-569
- The paper
- POLK, B. F., & KASPER, D. L. (1977). Bacteroides fragilis Subspecies in Clinical Isolates. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-86-5-569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.