Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bacteroides fragilis Subspecies in Clinical Isolates

POLK, B. FRANK, KASPER, DENNIS L.·1977·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Isolates of Bacteroides fragilis from 83 infected patients were collected during 2 years. Of 103 isolates, 68% were subspecies fragilis. This was the single most common subspecies isolated from blood (12/17), intra-abdominal (11/28), wound (17/20), perirectal (11/16), pelvic (6/10), and other (8/11) sites. Sixteen patients had B. fragilis isolated in pure culture. Of these, 9/12 blood cultures and 4/4 cultures from other sites were ss. fragilis. The recent observation that ss. fragilis organisms are encapsulated whereas the other subspecies are generally unencapsulated was supported by indirect fluorescent antibody studies using antibodies prepared to the capsular material of ss. fragilis. All 33 strains of ss. fragilis and none of 13 strains of other subspecies were positive. The predominance of ss. fragilis in clinical isolates compared to its relative infrequency in normal fecal flora and its predominance in pure cultures, especially of blood, indicate that this is the most virulent of B. fragilis subspecies. This virulence may be related to encapsulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-86-5-569

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
POLK, B. F., & KASPER, D. L.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1977-05-01
Volume
86
Issue
5
Pages
569-571
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2057454595
Cited by
188
References
0
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteroides fragilis Subspecies in Clinical Isolates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-86-5-569
The paper
POLK, B. F., & KASPER, D. L. (1977). Bacteroides fragilis Subspecies in Clinical Isolates. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-86-5-569

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.