Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Homosexuality in Perspective.

·1979·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Excerpt Building upon their landmark investigations of heterosexual physiologic response and dysfunction, which were published a decade ago, Masters and Johnson have released their long-awaited study of a largely neglected area within the field of human sexuality. The text is divided into two sections: "Preclinical Study, 1957-1970" and "Clinical Study, 1968-1977." The material in these sections parallels the content of the authors' two earlier works and might have been subtitled "homosexual response" and "homosexual inadequacy." The "preclinical study" presents description of sexual physiology and fantasy patterning in a homosexual study population, as observed in a laboratory environment. The population consists of...

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-91-6-938_1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1979-12-01
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
938-938
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2056600878
Cited by
274
References
0
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Homosexuality in Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-91-6-938_1
The paper
Homosexuality in Perspective. (1979). Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-91-6-938_1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.