Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Accidental Hepatitis-B-Surface-Antigen-Positive Inoculations: Use of e Antigen to Estimate Infectivity

WERNER, BARBARA G., GRADY, GEORGE F.·1982·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

We assessed the ability of radioimmunoassay for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to predict infectivity in exposed medical personnel by analyzing 390 samples of sera positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) that were implicated in accidental inoculations of known outcome. The radioimmunoassay detected HBeAg or its antibody (anti-HBe) in 91% of the donor sera. The incidence of hepatitis B was 19% (44 of 234) in recipients of HBeAg-positive sera but was only 2.5% (three of 121) in recipients of sera positive for anti-HBe, and nil (none of 35) in recipients of sera negative for HBeAg and anti-HBe. The known relation of HBeAg and infectivity was quantified by radioimmunoassay as a risk ratio of 10:1 (HBeAg-positive to HBeAg-negative) for this type of exposure. The sensitivity of the radioimmunoassay also showed that a large proportion (55%) of donor sera not producing hepatitis were positive for HBeAg; therefore, even the most flagrant needlestick exposures to HBsAg-positive sera often must involve subthreshold amounts of infective material.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-367

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
WERNER, B. G., & GRADY, G. F.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1982-09-01
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
367-369
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1979448771
Cited by
264
References
0
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.