Cited by 0Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentDiabetes Treatment and ManagementRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Efficacy and Safety of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Co-agonists for Weight Loss Among Adults Without Diabetes: An Updated Systematic Review

Moiz, Areesha, Filion, Kristian B., Samuels, Aaron E., Tsoukas, Michael A., Yu, Oriana H.Y., Peters, Tricia M., Eisenberg, Mark J.·2026·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are increasingly used for weight management. Purpose To update our prior systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs and co-agonists among adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes. Data sources MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 5 October 2024 through 25 March 2026. Study selection Randomized controlled trials ([RCTs] treatment duration ≥16 weeks). Data extraction Two reviewers independently extracted data. Data synthesis Thirty-eight RCTs ( n = 25 816) were included, adding 14 new trials ( n = 11 000) to the prior review. Among commercially available therapies, placebo-subtracted weight loss reached up to -5.8% (95% CI, -8.0% to -3.6%) for liraglutide, -14.8% (CI, -16.2% to -13.4%) for subcutaneous semaglutide, -14.3% (CI, -17.2% to -11.4%) for oral semaglutide, -12.4% (CI, -15.1% to -9.7%) for orforglipron, and -19.0% (CI, -21.6% to -16.4%) for tirzepatide. Numerically greater placebo-subtracted reductions were seen with emerging multiagonists, including -23.9% (CI, -29.3% to -18.5%) with amycretin and -22.1% (CI, -24.9% to -19.3%) with retatrutide. Gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) remained common (GLP-1 RA vs. placebo: 76.0% vs. 40.1%). Discontinuation due to AEs was generally low (10.7% vs. 3.4%) but numerically higher with some oral agents. Serious AEs (6.5% vs. 5.2%) and deaths (0.1% vs. 0.0%) were rare, with no new safety signals i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/annals-25-05519

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 63

Authors
Moiz, A., Filion, K. B., Samuels, A. E., Tsoukas, M. A., Yu, O. H. Y., Peters, T. M., & Eisenberg, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2026-10
Volume
179
Issue
10
Pages
1412-1429
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W7204813478
Cited by
0
References
63
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, weight loss, obesity, overweight, obesity treatment, semaglutide, liraglutide, tirzepatide, orforglipron, retatrutide, gastrointestinal adverse effects, drug safety
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Tirzepatide, Semaglutide, Adult, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Obesity, Peptides, Weight Loss, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Anti-Obesity Agents, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review