The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association Between Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and Nonfatal and Fatal Drug Overdoses: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Background: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are a key component of the president's Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention Plan to prevent opioid overdoses in the United States. Purpose: To examine whether PDMP implementation is associated with changes in nonfatal and fatal overdoses; identify features of programs differentially associated with those outcomes; and investigate any potential unintended consequences of the programs. Data Sources: Eligible publications from MEDLINE, Current Contents Connect (Clarivate Analytics), Science Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics), Social Sciences Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics), and ProQuest Dissertations indexed through 27 December 2017 and additional studies from reference lists. Study Selection: Observational studies (published in English) from U.S. states that examined an association between PDMP implementation and nonfatal or fatal overdoses. Data Extraction: 2 investigators independently extracted data from and rated the risk of bias (ROB) of studies by using established criteria. Consensus determinations involving all investigators were used to grade strength of evidence for each intervention. Data Synthesis: Of 2661 records, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. These articles examined PDMP implementation only (n = 8), program features only (n = 2), PDMP implementation and program features (n = 5), PDMP implementation with mandated provider review combined with pain clinic laws (n = 1), and PDMP robustness (n = 1). Evidence from 3 studies was insufficient to draw conclusions regarding an association between PDMP implementation and nonfatal overdoses. Low-strength evidence from 10 studies suggested a reduction in fatal overdoses with PDMP implementation. Program features associated with a decrease in overdose deaths included mandatory provider review, provider authorization to access PDMP data, frequency of reports, and monitoring of nonscheduled drugs. Three of 6 studies found an increase in heroin overdoses after PDMP implementation. Limitation: Few studies, high ROB, and heterogeneous analytic methods and outcome measurement. Conclusion: Evidence that PDMP implementation either increases or decreases nonfatal or fatal overdoses is largely insufficient, as is evidence regarding positive associations between specific administrative features and successful programs. Some evidence showed unintended consequences. Research is needed to identify a set of "best practices" and complementary initiatives to address these consequences. Primary Funding Source: National Institute on Drug Abuse and Bureau of Justice Assistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
Sterne, J. A., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., Viswanathan, M., Henry, D., Altman, D. G., Ansari, M. T., Boutron, I., et al. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919 · Cited by 20,329
Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths — United States, 2000–2014
Rudd, R. A., Aleshire, N., Zibbell, J. E., & Gladden, R. M. (2016) · MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6450a3 · Cited by 1,859
Vital signs: changes in opioid prescribing in the United States, 2006-2015.
Guy, G. P., Zhang, K., Bohm, M. K., Losby, J., Lewis, B., Young, R., Murphy, L. B., & Dowell, D. (2017) · MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6626a4 · Cited by 1,117
Han, B., Compton, W. M., Jones, C. M., & Cai, R. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.11859 · Cited by 366
Dowell, D., Zhang, K., Noonan, R. K., & Hockenberry, J. M. (2016) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0448 · Cited by 264 · cited 3×
“Except for the study by Dowell and colleagues (25) that measured the combined effect of state pain clinic laws and PDMPs, extant studies have focused largely on estimating PDMPs' effect on prescribing behaviors or health outcomes while statistically adjusting for complementary drug prevention programs (such as naloxon…”
BackgroundJoynt, M., Train, M. K., Robbins, B. W., Halterman, J. S., Caiola, E., & Fortuna, R. J. (2013) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-013-2516-z · Cited by 152
Cited by
Global patterns of opioid use and dependence: harms to populations, interventions, and future action
Degenhardt, L., Grebely, J., Stone, J., Hickman, M., Vickerman, P., Marshall, B. D. L., Bruneau, J., Altice, F. L., Henderson, G., Rahimi-Movaghar, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32229-9 · Cited by 832
Rhodes, E., Wilson, M., Robinson, A., Hayden, J. A., & Asbridge, M. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4642-8 · Cited by 103
Spithoff, S., Mathieson, S., Sullivan, F., Guan, Q., Sud, A., Hum, S., & O'Brien, M. A. (2020) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2020.04.190199 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Fink, D. S., Schleimer, J. P., Sarvet, A., Grover, K. K., Delcher, C., Castillo-Carniglia, A., Kim, J. H., Rivera-Aguirre, A. E., Henry, S. G., Martins, S. S., & Cerdá, M.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2018-06-05
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 783-790
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2800278321
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 29.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association Between Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and Nonfatal and Fatal Drug Overdoses: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/m17-3074
- The paper
- Fink, D. S., Schleimer, J. P., Sarvet, A., Grover, K. K., Delcher, C., Castillo-Carniglia, A., Kim, J. H., Rivera-Aguirre, A. E., Henry, S. G., Martins, S. S., & Cerdá, M. (2018). Association Between Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and Nonfatal and Fatal Drug Overdoses: A Systematic Review. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/m17-3074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.