The Limitations of Poor Broadband Internet Access for Telemedicine Use in Rural America: An Observational Study
Abstract
Letters3 September 2019The Limitations of Poor Broadband Internet Access for Telemedicine Use in Rural America: An Observational StudyColeman Drake, PhD, Yuehan Zhang, ScM, Krisda H. Chaiyachati, MD, MPH, MSHP, and Daniel Polsky, PhDColeman Drake, PhDUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (C.D.), Yuehan Zhang, ScMUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Y.Z., K.H.C.), Krisda H. Chaiyachati, MD, MPH, MSHPUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Y.Z., K.H.C.), and Daniel Polsky, PhDJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (D.P.)Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/M19-0283 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Background: Fewer than 10% of U.S. physicians practice in rural communities, where 25% of Americans live (1). Yet, rural Americans may need more health care as they become increasingly older and sicker relative to their urban counterparts (2). Telemedicine has been proposed as a solution to improve access to care (3). Federal and state policymakers have enacted policies to expand telemedicine use among publicly and commercially insured beneficiaries. However, whether Americans with the poorest access to care have the necessary broadband Internet capability to fully benefit from telemedicine is unknown.Objective: To identify whether Americans with inadequate access to primary ...References1. Sharp D, Bond…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although telemedicine offers an alternative for addressing the physician shortage in rural areas, the unstable and inadequate broadband infrastructure in these regions remains a significant obstacle to providing equitable care.
“Although telemedicine, including video calls and mobile consultations, offers an alternative for addressing the physician shortage in rural areas, the unstable and inadequate broadband infrastructure in these regions remains a significant obstacle to providing equitable care [45].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 2 · Cited by 179
- Authors
- Drake, C., Zhang, Y., Chaiyachati, K. H., & Polsky, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2019-09-03
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 382-384
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2946322813
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 19.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
- Keywords
- telemedicine, broadband access, rural health care, urban-rural differences, health care access, primary care access, rural health workforce, health care utilization, digital divide
- MeSH terms
- Internet Access, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Mental Health Services, Primary Health Care, United States, Telemedicine, Rural Health Services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review