Cited by 111Curcumin's Biomedical ApplicationsOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsPharmacological Effects of Medicinal Plants

Effectiveness of Curcuma longa Extract for the Treatment of Symptoms and Effusion–Synovitis of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial

Wang, Zhiqiang, Jones, Graeme, Winzenberg, Tania, Cai, Guoqi, Laslett, Laura L., Aitken, Dawn, Hopper, Ingrid, Singh, Ambrish +4 more·2020·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Current pharmacologic therapies for patients with osteoarthritis are suboptimal. Objective To determine the efficacy of Curcuma longa extract (CL) for reducing knee symptoms and effusion-synovitis in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and knee effusion-synovitis. Design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000080224). Setting Single-center study with patients from southern Tasmania, Australia. Participants 70 participants with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and ultrasonography-defined effusion-synovitis. Intervention 2 capsules of CL ( n = 36) or matched placebo ( n = 34) per day for 12 weeks. Measurements The 2 primary outcomes were changes in knee pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and effusion-synovitis volume on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The key secondary outcomes were change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and cartilage composition values. Outcomes were assessed over 12 weeks. Results CL improved VAS pain compared with placebo by -9.1 mm (95% CI, -17.8 to -0.4 mm [ P = 0.039]) but did not change effusion-synovitis volume (3.2 mL [CI, -0.3 to 6.8 mL]). CL also improved WOMAC knee pain (-47.2 mm [CI, -81.2 to -13.2 mm]; P = 0.006) but not lateral femoral cartilage T2 relaxation time (-0.4 ms [CI, -1.1 to 0.3 ms]). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the CL ( n = 14 [39%]) and placebo ( n = 18 [53%]) groups (…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m20-0990

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Jones, G., Winzenberg, T., Cai, G., Laslett, L. L., Aitken, D., Hopper, I., Singh, A., Jones, R., Fripp, J., Ding, C., & Antony, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
  • University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (J.F.)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2020-12-01
Volume
173
Issue
11
Pages
861-869
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W3085016592
Cited by
111
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 21
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Curcumin's Biomedical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacological Effects of Medicinal Plants
Keywords
turmeric, turmeric extract, knee osteoarthritis, knee pain, knee effusion, synovitis, cartilage composition, T2 relaxation time, WOMAC, natural remedies, adverse events, knee ultrasound, cartilage degeneration, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Knee Joint, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Plant Extracts, Synovitis, Ultrasonography, Arthralgia, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Curcuma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review