Cited by 182COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir for Early COVID-19 in a Large U.S. Health System: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Open access
Dryden-Peterson, Scott, Kim, Andy, Kim, Arthur Y., Caniglia, Ellen C., Lennes, Inga T., Patel, Rajesh, Gainer, Lindsay, Dutton, Lisa +4 more·2023·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background In the EPIC-HR (Evaluation of Protease Inhibition for Covid-19 in High-Risk Patients) trial, nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir led to an 89% reduction in hospitalization or death among unvaccinated outpatients with early COVID-19. The clinical impact of nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir among vaccinated populations is uncertain. Objective To assess whether nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir reduces risk for hospitalization or death among outpatients with early COVID-19 in the setting of prevalent SARS-CoV-2 immunity and immune-evasive SARS-CoV-2 lineages. Design Population-based cohort study analyzed to emulate a clinical trial using inverse probability-weighted models to account for anticipated bias in treatment. Setting A large health care system providing care for 1.5 million patients in Massachusetts and New Hampshire during the Omicron wave (1 January to 17 July 2022). Patients 44 551 nonhospitalized adults (90.3% with ≥3 vaccine doses) aged 50 years or older with COVID-19 and no contraindications for nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir. Measurements The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization within 14 days or death within 28 days of a COVID-19 diagnosis. Results During the study period, 12 541 (28.1%) patients were prescribed nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir, and 32 010 (71.9%) were not. Patients prescribed nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir were more likely to be older, have more comorbidities, and be vaccinated. The composite outcome of hospitalization or death occurred in 69 (0.55%)…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m22-2141

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dryden-Peterson, S., Kim, A., Kim, A. Y., Caniglia, E. C., Lennes, I. T., Patel, R., Gainer, L., Dutton, L., Donahue, E., Gandhi, R. T., Baden, L. R., & Woolley, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, and Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute, Gaborone, Botswana (S.D.)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Lahey Medical Center (US)
  • Mass General Brigham (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2023-01
Volume
176
Issue
1
Pages
77-84
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W4312113671
Cited by
182
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 7
FWCI
20.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA236546)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K01HD100222)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, Omicron variant, outpatients, hospitalization, mortality, antiviral therapy, inverse probability weighting, health care utilization, health care costs, older adults
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, COVID-19 Testing, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Adult, Antiviral Agents, Humans, Cohort Studies, Ritonavir

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review