The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hashtag: Social Media as a Source for Developing Community
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A consistent attribute of Black Twitter is the critiquing of power, which is part of a long lineage of Black folks speaking truth to power.
“A consistent attribute of Black Twitter is the critiquing of power, which is part of a long lineage of Black folks speaking truth to power.”
From Exploring #Diasporawars on Black Twitter (2025) · cites this paper as Clark, 2020
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring #Diasporawars on Black Twitter
Musgrave, T., Ye, Y., Toyama, K., Schoenebeck, S., & Threats, M. (2025) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051251352834 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, M. D.
- Corresponding author
- Clark, Meredith D.
- ORCID
- Clark, Meredith D.
- Venue
- Presumed Incompetent II: Race, Class, Power, and Resistance of Women in Academia
- Publisher
- Utah State University Press
- Published
- 2020-05-05
- Pages
- 269-279
- OpenAlex
- W3029836394
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Utah State University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Keywords
- hashtags, social media, community development, online communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
