Psychometric properties of the spanish version of The Distress Tolerance Scale and its relationship with personality and psychopathological symptoms
Open accessAbstract
Background Distress tolerance is defined as the individual’s capacity to experience and withstand negative psychological states. The goal of this study was to examine the psychometric properties and the factor structure of the Spanish version of the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS) and to test its relationship with psychopathological symptoms and personality. Method A sample of 650 participants completed the DTS, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised–Abbreviated) (EPQR-A), and the Symptom Assessment-45 Questionnaire (SA-45). Results The DTS showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and adequate temporal stability (7-month test-retest). Results of a confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized 4-factor structure (tolerance, appraisal, absorption, and regulation) that load onto a higher-order general factor. A structural equation model (SEM) was tested to provide evidence of construct validity. Neuroticism was inversely associated with distress tolerance, and distress tolerance partially mediated the effects of neuroticism on current symptoms. Results indicated that the Spanish DTS mediated associations between personality traits and current psychiatric symptoms. Conclusions Results support the use of this version as a useful tool for assessing distress tolerance in clinical and research settings in Spanish-speaking countries. In addition, we found that distress tolerance may form a link between neuroticism and psychopathology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Spanish validation of DTS has good internal consistency (0.83 ≥ α ≤ 0.89).
“Good internal consistency was found in the Spanish validation (0.83 ≥ α ≤ 0.89; Sandín et al., 2017).”
From Unified Protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders in people with post COVID-19 condition: study protocol for a multiple baseline n-of-1 trial (2023) · cites this paper as Sandín et al., 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 53
- Authors
- Sandín, B., Simons, J., Valiente, R., Simons, R., & Chorot, P.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES)
- University of South Dakota (US)
- Venue
- Psicothema
- Publisher
- Grupo Editorial Psicofundación
- Published
- 2017-08-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 421-428
- ISSN
- 0214-9915 (ISSN-L)
- 1886-144X
- OpenAlex
- W2752391040
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psicothema (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- distress tolerance, Distress Tolerance Scale, Spanish translation, psychometric properties, factor structure, neuroticism, personality traits, psychiatric symptoms, mediation, construct validity, temporal stability
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Tests, Psychometrics, Translations, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review