Cited by 53Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Traits and Psychology

Psychometric properties of the spanish version of The Distress Tolerance Scale and its relationship with personality and psychopathological symptoms

Open access
Sandín, Bonifacio, Simons, Jeffrey, Valiente, Rosa, Simons, Raluca, Chorot, Paloma·2017·Psicothema

Abstract

Background Distress tolerance is defined as the individual’s capacity to experience and withstand negative psychological states. The goal of this study was to examine the psychometric properties and the factor structure of the Spanish version of the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS) and to test its relationship with psychopathological symptoms and personality. Method A sample of 650 participants completed the DTS, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised–Abbreviated) (EPQR-A), and the Symptom Assessment-45 Questionnaire (SA-45). Results The DTS showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and adequate temporal stability (7-month test-retest). Results of a confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized 4-factor structure (tolerance, appraisal, absorption, and regulation) that load onto a higher-order general factor. A structural equation model (SEM) was tested to provide evidence of construct validity. Neuroticism was inversely associated with distress tolerance, and distress tolerance partially mediated the effects of neuroticism on current symptoms. Results indicated that the Spanish DTS mediated associations between personality traits and current psychiatric symptoms. Conclusions Results support the use of this version as a useful tool for assessing distress tolerance in clinical and research settings in Spanish-speaking countries. In addition, we found that distress tolerance may form a link between neuroticism and psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7334/psicothema2016.239

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 53

Authors
Sandín, B., Simons, J., Valiente, R., Simons, R., & Chorot, P.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES)
  • University of South Dakota (US)
Venue
Psicothema
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
3
Issue
29
Pages
421-428
ISSN
  • 0214-9915 (ISSN-L)
  • 1886-144X
OpenAlex
W2752391040
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psicothema (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
distress tolerance, Distress Tolerance Scale, Spanish translation, psychometric properties, factor structure, neuroticism, personality traits, psychiatric symptoms, mediation, construct validity, temporal stability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Tests, Psychometrics, Translations, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review