Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 64Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceGender, Sexuality, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reduction of sexist attitudes, romantic myths, and aggressive behaviors in adolescents: Efficacy of the DARSI program

Open access
Carrascosa, Laura, Cava, María-Jesús, Buelga, Sofía, de Jesus, Saúl-Neves·2019·Psicothema

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The DARSI program (Developing Healthy and Egalitarian Adolescent Relationships) aims to prevent peer aggressive behaviors inside and outside social networks and educate adolescents on gender equality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the program on the reduction of sexist attitudes, myths of romantic love and aggressive behaviors in adolescents. METHOD: 191 adolescents, aged 12 to 17 years (53.93% girls), assigned to an experimental group (3 classrooms) and two control groups (6 classrooms in two educational centers) participated in this study. A quasi-experimental design with control group was used and the effectiveness of the program was evaluated using a repeated measures factorial design. RESULTS: Findings showed a significant decrease in the experimental group in hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, myths of romantic love, direct aggression, relational aggression, and cyber-aggression. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of the evaluated program and the viability of joint interventions in the prevention of peer violence and teen dating violence are observed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7334/psicothema2018.245

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Carrascosa, L., Cava, M.-J., Buelga, S., & de Jesus, S.-N.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de València (ES)
  • Universidade do Algarve
Corresponding author
Carrascosa, Laura
Venue
Psicothema
Published
2019-05-01
Volume
2
Issue
31
Pages
121-127
ISSN
  • 0214-9915 (ISSN-L)
  • 1886-144X
OpenAlex
W2945279161
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psicothema (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • American Concrete Institute Foundation
  • Generalitat Valenciana
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
sexist attitudes, gender stereotypes, aggression, adolescents, gender equality in education, adolescent dating violence, online aggression, relational aggression, direct aggression, hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, school-based intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Aggression, Attitude, Child, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Efficiency, Organizational, Sexism, Romanticism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.