Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6Latin American history and cultureHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaHistory and Politics in Latin America

The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 27 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Objetos y cultura. rituales, flujos y elaboraciones en el Nuevo Reino de Granada

Open access
Jiménez Meneses, Orián·2009·Historia Crítica

Abstract

This article studies the circulation, appropriation, and commercial and symbolic uses of objects in colonial society, suggesting ways to understand the circulation of objects and commodities through the spaces of the New Kingdom of Granada. It tries to specify the functions played by objects in domestic life and, based on their circulation, to weave together the communications they established between cities, towns, and settlements and the centers of power in Antioquia and the Viceroyalty during the eighteenth century. By going behind the historicity of the objects, the marks they made and their creation, we can better understand the dimensions of their routes, circuits, and nodes as a substantial part of the culture and the relations of interdependence with other societies.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This article examines the circulation, appropriation, and commercial and symbolic uses of objects in colonial New Kingdom of Granada society, especially eighteenth-century Antioquia and the Viceroyalty. It argues that objects were social elaborations and cultural mediators linking domestic life, rituals, roads, and trade.

Key findings

  • Objects in colonial domestic life were socially differentiated and ritualized: elites used silver cutlery, mirrors, religious images, fine china, and books, while common people used clay vessels, coconuts with silver bases, and often ate with their hands.
  • In mining, tools became identifiers: in Nóvita and Citará slave cuadrillas, the text distinguishes *negros de barra*, *negros de batea*, *negros de almocafre*, *negros de cachos*, and the *negro forjador/herrero/maestro de la fragua*; names and ethnic origins sometimes disappeared in favor of the object/tool each enslaved person carried.
  • Between 1773 and 1777, the three power centers of the Province of Antioquia—Rionegro, Medellín, and Santa Fe—received 5,157, 2,653, and 1,152 *cargas* of clothing, Castilian/Quito/Kingdom goods, respectively, linked to mining expansion, population growth, and slight road improvement.
  • Dress and objects marked ethnic and social privilege and were regulated by Indian legislation: *negras* and *mulatas* were prohibited from wearing gold, pearls, or silk, except married to Spaniards under limited conditions, while capes, daggers, and swords were reserved for nobility and people of Spanish origin.

Methods

  • Historical and qualitative study of material culture, drawing on archival sources including AGN (*Testamentarías del Cauca*, *Negros y esclavos del Cauca*, *Mejoras Materiales*, *Juicios Civiles*, *Abastos*), AHJM (Caja 177, Caja 191), AHM (*Cabildo*), and ACC (*Minas*), plus printed primary sources and secondary literature.
  • Analyzes circulation, appropriation, commercial and symbolic uses of objects in domestic life, rituals, roads, and trade, focusing on eighteenth-century Antioquia and the Viceroyalty of New Granada.
  • No formal sampling or statistical model is used; evidence comes from testaments, inventories, letters, lawsuits, cabildo records, and administrative/traveler reports.

Limitations

  • The paper states no explicit limitations.
  • Evident from the text: it is a broad interpretive essay relying on selected archival examples and secondary synthesis, without systematic sampling or quantitative analysis, so findings are illustrative rather than exhaustive.
  • Evident from the text: geographic and temporal scope is concentrated on eighteenth-century Antioquia and the Viceroyalty, with some nineteenth-century asides, rather than a comprehensive survey of the entire New Kingdom of Granada.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7440/histcrit39.2009.04

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 15 Not valid · 27 Not checked · 48 Own results and interpretations

27 more claims

Create a free account to see all 90 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 53
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 18
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Jiménez Meneses, O.
Venue
Historia Crítica
Published
2009-09-01
Issue
39
Pages
44-61
ISSN
  • 0121-1617 (ISSN-L)
  • 1900-6152
OpenAlex
W1530192258
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Historia Crítica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Greater South Information System
  • Historia Crítica (cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History and Politics in Latin America
Keywords
material culture, circulation of objects, colonial society, New Kingdom of Granada, ritual, domestic life, trade and commerce, Antioquia, Viceroyalty of New Granada, 18th century, cultural exchange

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.