Cited by 0Healthcare Quality and ManagementHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

Revitalizing Care Program in UK Healthcare: Does it Add Up?

Open access
Riley, Kay, Gibbs, Deanna·2014·Global Advances in Health and Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Health Service (NHS) is a publicly funded health service in the United Kingdom that provides free point-of-use services for UK residents. In England, the NHS annual budget currently equates to £106 million. As the global financial climate has changed, so too has the real-terms budget available to meet spiralling healthcare costs in the United Kingdom. There is now unprecedented pressure on NHS Trusts to provide efficiency savings while maintaining the same levels of clinical service availability. In this climate, concerns arise regarding how best to ensure maintenance of the quality of service users experience of their care in addition to efficacy and efficiency targets. Barts Health NHS Trust is the largest healthcare trust in the United Kingdom. A collaboration of stakeholders was established in 2010 to ensure an increased focus on the provision of compassionate care in all patient services as part of enhancing the overall patient experience. This initiative incorporated the implementation of the HeartMath Revitalizing Care Program in order to build staff resilience and enable workers to more efficiently manage their work and personal stress. Additionally, the project implementation enabled the first trial of the HeartMath Revitalizing Care Program within the context of NHS England services. METHODS: Using a pilot program model, the HeartMath Revitalizing Care Program was provided in four departments in the Trust from August to October 2011. Pilot areas included three clinical wards and one reception area. Over the 3-month period, 97 staff members participated in the workshops. Evaluation of the project was conducted using pre and post measures at two time points through the completion of the Personal and Organizational Quality Assessment – Revised 4 Scale (POQA-R4) and review of staff turnover, sickness absence rates, and complaints. RESULTS: The evaluation indicated that the participants demonstrated improvements in nine of the 10 personal qualities categories. These changes were statistically significant in eight areas, with fatigue and calmness showing the greatest evidence of change. Only one area in the rating of organizational qualities showed a statistically significant change, which was expected due to the short timeframe of the post-project evaluation. The results of the pre-post comparison of staff turnover, sickness absence, and complaints were inconclusive. CONCLUSION: The completion of the pilot project clearly demonstrated both a direct benefit for staff and the transferability of the HeartMath Revitalizing Care program to the UK health provider context. Further evaluation is required to determine the impact of building staff resilience on improving service-user's experience of care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7453/gahmj.2014.bpa10

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Providing emotional self-regulation skills combined with heart rhythm coherence training results in significant improvements in communication, employee satisfaction, productivity, problem solving, reduced turnover, and a significant return on investment, both financially and socially.

    “It has been shown that providing emotional self-regulation skills combined with heart rhythm coherence training results in significant improvements in communication, employee satisfaction, productivity, problem solving, reduced turnover, and a significant return on investment, both financially and socially (15, 67, 73, 86, 90–92).”

    From New Frontiers in Heart Rate Variability and Social Coherence Research: Techniques, Technologies, and Implications for Improving Group Dynamics and Outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as [92]

    The available indexed passage is article information (p. BPA10) and keywords, not a report of outcomes. Searches for communication, satisfaction, productivity, turnover, and financial or social return found no passage addressing those claimed improvements. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Riley, K., & Gibbs, D.
Affiliations
National Health Service (GB)
Venue
Global Advances in Health and Medicine
Published
2014-01
Volume
3
Issue
1_suppl
ISSN
  • 2164-9561 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-957X
OpenAlex
W2070869128
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Advances in Health and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
employee resilience, compassionate care, patient experience, NHS trusts, fatigue, tranquility, employee turnover, sick leave, healthcare workforce, organizational quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review