Cited by 434Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingPhonetics and Phonology Research

SUPERSEDED - CSTR VCTK Corpus: English Multi-speaker Corpus for CSTR Voice Cloning Toolkit

Open access
Veaux, Christophe, Yamagishi, Junichi, MacDonald, Kirsten·2016·University of Edinburgh. The Centre for Speech Technology Research (CSTR)

Abstract

# SUPERSEDED - This item has been replaced by the one which can be found at https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/1994 . # This CSTR VCTK Corpus (Centre for Speech Technology Voice Cloning Toolkit) includes speech data uttered by 109 native speakers of English with various accents. Each speaker reads out about 400 sentences, most of which were selected from a newspaper plus the Rainbow Passage and an elicitation paragraph intended to identify the speaker's accent. The newspaper texts were taken from The Herald (Glasgow), with permission from Herald & Times Group. Each speaker reads a different set of the newspaper sentences, where each set was selected using a greedy algorithm designed to maximise the contextual and phonetic coverage. The Rainbow Passage and elicitation paragraph are the same for all speakers. The Rainbow Passage can be found in the International Dialects of English Archive: (http://web.ku.edu/~idea/readings/rainbow.htm). The elicitation paragraph is identical to the one used for the speech accent archive (http://accent.gmu.edu). The details of the speech accent archive can be found at http://www.ualberta.ca/~aacl2009/PDFs/WeinbergerKunath2009AACL.pdf . All speech data were recorded using an identical recording setup: an omni-directional head-mounted microphone (DPA 4035), 96kHz sampling frequency at 24 bits and in a hemi-anechoic chamber of the University of Edinburgh. All recordings were converted into 16 bits, downsampled to 48 kHz based on STPK, and manually end-poi…

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.7488/ds/1495

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ASVspoof 2019 dataset was constructed using the VCTK corpus, featuring recordings from 107 speakers.

    “This dataset was constructed using the VCTK corpus [73], featuring recordings from 107 speakers.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 434

Authors
Veaux, C., Yamagishi, J., & MacDonald, K.
Venue
University of Edinburgh. The Centre for Speech Technology Research (CSTR)
Publisher
University of Edinburgh. The Centre for Speech Technology Research (CSTR)
Published
2016
OpenAlex
W2527729766
Cited by
434
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Locations
University of Edinburgh
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
VCTK, voice cloning, multi-speaker speech, speech accent, Rainbow Passage, native English speakers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review