The DOI matches its Crossref record.
KLD-Sampling: Adaptive Particle Filters
Abstract
Over the last years, particle filters have been applied with great success to a variety of state estimation problems. We present a statistical approach to increasing the efficiency of particle filters by adapting the size of sample sets on-the-fly. The key idea of the KLD-sampling method is to bound the approximation error introduced by the sample-based representation of the particle filter. The name KLD-sampling is due to the fact that we measure the approximation error by the Kullback-Leibler distance. Our adaptation approach chooses a small number of samples if the density is focused on a small part of the state space, and it chooses a large number of samples if the state uncertainty is high. Both the implementation and computation overhead of this approach are small. Extensive experiments using mobile robot localization as a test application show that our approach yields drastic improvements over particle filters with fixed sample set sizes and over a previously introduced adaptation technique. 1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Design and use paradigms for gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator
Koenig, N., & Howard, A. (2005) · 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566) · doi:10.1109/iros.2004.1389727 · Cited by 3,638
Anticipating Human Activities Using Object Affordances for Reactive Robotic Response
Koppula, H. S., & Saxena, A. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2430335 · Cited by 596
The Office Marathon: Robust navigation in an indoor office environment
Marder-Eppstein, E., Berger, E., Foote, T., Gerkey, B., & Konolige, K. (2010) · 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.2010.5509725 · Cited by 517
Pedestrian localisation for indoor environments
Woodman, O., & Harle, R. (2008) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing · doi:10.1145/1409635.1409651 · Cited by 486
Anticipating Human Activities using Object Affordances for Reactive Robotic Response
Koppula, H., & Saxena, A. (2013) · Robotics: Science and Systems IX · doi:10.15607/rss.2013.ix.006 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, D.
- Venue
- Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2002-11-08
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 713-720
- OpenAlex
- W2162729570
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.93
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: KLD-Sampling: Adaptive Particle Filters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/1120.003.0096
- The paper
- Fox, D. (2002). KLD-Sampling: Adaptive Particle Filters. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1120.003.0096
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.