The Manifesto for Teaching Online
Open accessAbstract
An update to a provocative manifesto intended to serve as a platform for debate and as a resource and inspiration for those teaching in online environments. In 2011, a group of scholars associated with the Centre for Research in Digital Education at the University of Edinburgh released “The Manifesto for Teaching Online,” a series of provocative statements intended to articulate their pedagogical philosophy. In the original manifesto and a 2016 update, the authors counter both the “impoverished” vision of education being advanced by corporate and governmental edtech and higher education's traditional view of online students and teachers as second-class citizens. The two versions of the manifesto were much discussed, shared, and debated. In this book, Siân Bayne, Peter Evans, Rory Ewins, Jeremy Knox, James Lamb, Hamish Macleod, Clara O'Shea, Jen Ross, Philippa Sheail and Christine Sinclair have expanded the text of the 2016 manifesto, revealing the sources and larger arguments behind the abbreviated provocations. The book groups the twenty-one statements (“Openness is neither neutral nor natural: it creates and depends on closures”; “Don't succumb to campus envy: we are the campus”) into five thematic sections examining place and identity, politics and instrumentality, the primacy of text and the ethics of remixing, the way algorithms and analytics “recode” educational intent, and how surveillance culture can be resisted. Much like the original manifestos, this book is intende…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI-enabled assessment constitutes an administrative-rather than a pedagogic-gaze, impinging on the fragile conditions of trust that most educators see as underpinning the teacher/student relationship.
“In this sense, it could be argued that AI-enabled assessment constitutes an administrative-rather than a pedagogic-gaze, impinging on the fragile conditions of trust that most educators see as underpinning the teacher/student relationship: … in higher education settings, a culture of surveillance, facilitated and intensified by technology, risks creating conditions that are highly risk averse and”
From Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence (2022) · cites this paper as Bayne et al., 2020
Cites
Student retention in distance education: are we failing our students?
Simpson, O. (2013) · Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning · doi:10.1080/02680513.2013.847363 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5 · Cited by 1,252 · see citing works
Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence
Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
A necessary evil? The rise of online exam proctoring in Australian universities
Selwyn, N., O’Neill, C., Smith, G., Andrejevic, M., & Gu, X. (2023) · Media International Australia · doi:10.1177/1329878x211005862 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bayne, S., Evans, P., Ewins, R., Knox, J., Lamb, J., Macleod, H., O'Shea, C., Ross, J., Sheail, P., Sinclair, C., & Johnston, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2020-09-15
- OpenAlex
- W2339811320
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 33.40
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
- Keywords
- online learning, digital education, philosophy of education, higher education, campus identity, politics of education, remix, algorithmic surveillance, educational analytics, COVID-19 pandemic, teaching quality, inclusion, access to education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review