The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Online Afterlives: Immortality, Memory, and Grief in Digital Culture
Abstract
How digital technology—from Facebook tributes to QR codes on headstones—is changing our relationship to death. Facebook is the biggest cemetery in the world, with countless acres of cyberspace occupied by snapshots, videos, thoughts, and memories of people who have shared their last status updates. Modern society usually hides death from sight, as if it were a character flaw and not an ineluctable fact. But on Facebook and elsewhere on the internet, we can't avoid death; digital ghosts—electronic traces of the dead—appear at our click or touch. On the Internet at least, death has once again become a topic for public discourse. In Online Afterlives, Davide Sisto considers how digital technology is changing our relationship to death. Sisto describes the various modes of digital survival after biological death—including Facebook tributes, chatbots programmed to speak in the voice of a dead person, and QR codes on headstones—and discusses their philosophical ramifications. Sisto reports on such phenomena as the Tweet Hereafter, a website that collects people's last tweets; the intimacy of sending a WhatsApp message to someone who has died; and digital cremation, the deactivation of a dead person's account. Because we can mingle with the dead online almost as we mingle with the living, he warns, we may find it difficult to distinguish communication at a distance from communication with the dead. The digital afterlife has restored the communal dimension of death, rescuing both mourners and the mourned from social isolation. A society willing to engage with death and mortality, Sisto argues, is a more balanced and mature society.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the Personal.AI 25 app can be employed to create a ' unique model that truly represents who you are ' , including voice cloning features, allowing users to create a ' complete ' version of themselves in the form of bespoke AI.”
From AI and memory (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cited by
Hollanek, T., & Nowaczyk-Basińska, K. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00744-w · Cited by 193
Hoskins, A. (2024) · Memory, Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2024.16 · Cited by 64
“The so called ‘ digital afterlife industry ’ (Bassett 2022; Kasket 2019; Lagerkvist 2017; Öhman and Floridi 2018; Sisto 2020; W.H. Wong 2023) became firmly established in the 2010s.”
Deep Nostalgia: Remediated memory, algorithmic nostalgia and technological ambivalence
Kidd, J., & McAvoy, E. N. (2023) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565221149839 · Cited by 42
“Digital environments offer a multitude of ways for users to remember or even interact with the dead, to the extent that we might now say ‘ technology is where the dead live ’ (Kasket, 2019:7) or even, the ‘ digitally undead ’ (Sisto, 2020: 3).”
BackgroundCommunicative remembering: Revisiting a basic mnemonic concept
Pentzold, C., Lohmeier, C., & Birkner, T. (2023) · Memory Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2023.7 · Cited by 35
“What is more, next to human users, other communicative agents like virtual personas, ‘ thanabots ’ , and voice assistants are taking on an increasingly important role in shaping communicative remembering (Henrickson 2023; Kansteiner 2022; Sisto and Mclellan-Broussard 2020).”
BackgroundCases of Using ChatGPT as a Mental Health and Psychological Support Tool
Giray, L. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet · doi:10.1080/15398285.2024.2442374 · Cited by 42
“As highlighted by Sisto (2020), creating and interacting with a digital likeness of the deceased could complicate the grief process.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Sisto, D.
- Corresponding author
- Sisto, Davide
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2020-09-01
- OpenAlex
- W4230205326
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
- Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- digital afterlife, chatbots, speech synthesis, online mourning, death and mortality, social media, social isolation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.