The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Embodied, Enactive Education: Conservative versus Radical Approaches
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Montessori classrooms, thought of as crafted epistemic niches made up of affordances that aim to keep children on the edge of their capabilities and truly allow students to ‘experience first, signify later’ [132], offer opportunities to make errors.”
From Active inference goes to school: the importance of active learning in the age of large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [132]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Di Paolo, L. D., White, B., Guénin-Carlut, A., Constant, A., & Clark, A. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0148 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutto, D. D., & Abrahamson, D.
- Venue
- Movement Matters
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2022-04-19
- Pages
- 39-52
- OpenAlex
- W4225931541
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 121.80
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Corporeality, Perception, and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Physical Education and Pedagogy
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- embodied learning, enactive learning, radical pedagogy, embodiment in education, movement education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
