The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution "On Purpose": Teleonomy in Living Systems
Open accessAbstract
A unique exploration of teleonomy—also known as “evolved purposiveness”—as a major influence in evolution by a broad range of specialists in biology and the philosophy of science. The evolved purposiveness of living systems, termed “teleonomy” by chronobiologist Colin Pittendrigh, has been both a major outcome and causal factor in the history of life on Earth. Many theorists have appreciated this over the years, going back to Lamarck and even Darwin in the nineteenth century. In the mid-twentieth century, however, the complex, dynamic process of evolution was simplified into the one-way, bottom-up, single gene-centered paradigm widely known as the modern synthesis. In Evolution “On Purpose,” edited by Peter A. Corning, Stuart A. Kauffman, Denis Noble, James A. Shapiro, Richard I. Vane-Wright, and Addy Pross, some twenty theorists attempt to modify this reductive approach by exploring in depth the different ways in which living systems have themselves shaped the course of evolution. Evolution “On Purpose” puts forward a more inclusive theoretical synthesis that goes far beyond the underlying principles and assumptions of the modern synthesis to accommodate work since the 1950s in molecular genetics, developmental biology, epigenetic inheritance, genomics, multilevel selection, niche construction, physiology, behavior, biosemiotics, chemical reaction theory, and other fields. In the view of the authors, active biological processes are responsible for the direction and the rate of evolution. Essays in this collection grapple with topics from the two-way “read-write” genome to cognition and decision-making in plants to the niche-construction activities of many organisms to the self-making evolution of humankind. As this collection compellingly shows, and as bacterial geneticist James Shapiro emphasizes, “The capacity of living organisms to alter their own heredity is undeniable.”
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Proteinoid complexes played a wide variety of roles, from structural elements lining microchamber walls to facilitating the binding of smaller molecules.
“Proteinoid complexes composed of various amino acids can assume a remarkable variety of configurations, and we suspect they played a wide variety of roles from functioning as (somewhat amorphous) structural elements, lining the microchamber walls (along with lipids), to facilitating the binding of smaller molecules, thus allowing them to interact with other small molecules [109].”
From Opinion: The Key Steps in the Origin of Life to the Formation of the Eukaryotic Cell (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Opinion: The Key Steps in the Origin of Life to the Formation of the Eukaryotic Cell
Brunk, C. F., & Marshall, C. R. (2024) · Life · doi:10.3390/life14020226 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Corning, P. A., Kauffman, S. A., Noble, D., Shapiro, J. A., Vane-Wright, R. I., & Pross, A.
- ORCID
- Denis Noble
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2023-08-22
- OpenAlex
- W4382600902
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 33.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- teleonomy, directionality of evolution, niche construction, multilevel selection, epigenetic inheritance, plant cognition, biosemiotics, human evolution, Lamarckism, Darwinism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review