The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America
Abstract
The Closed World offers a radically new alternative to the canonical histories of computers and cognitive science. Arguing that we can make sense of computers as tools only when we simultaneously grasp their roles as metaphors and political icons, Paul Edwards shows how Cold War social and cultural contexts shaped emerging computer technology—and were transformed, in turn, by information machines. The Closed World explores three apparently disparate histories—the history of American global power, the history of computing machines, and the history of subjectivity in science and culture—through the lens of the American political imagination. In the process, it reveals intimate links between the military projects of the Cold War, the evolution of digital computers, and the origins of cybernetics, cognitive psychology, and artificial intelligence. Edwards begins by describing the emergence of a "closed-world discourse" of global surveillance and control through high-technology military power. The Cold War political goal of "containment" led to the SAGE continental air defense system, Rand Corporation studies of nuclear strategy, and the advanced technologies of the Vietnam War. These and other centralized, computerized military command and control projects—for containing world-scale conflicts—helped closed-world discourse dominate Cold War political decisions. Their apotheosis was the Reagan-era plan for a "Star Wars" space-based ballistic missile defense. Edwards then shows how these military projects helped computers become axial metaphors in psychological theory. Analyzing the Macy Conferences on cybernetics, the Harvard Psycho-Acoustic Laboratory, and the early history of artificial intelligence, he describes the formation of a "cyborg discourse." By constructing both human minds and artificial intelligences as information machines, cyborg discourse assisted in integrating people into the hyper-complex technological systems of the closed world. Finally, Edwards explores the cyborg as political identity in science fiction—from the disembodied, panoptic AI of 2001: A Space Odyssey, to the mechanical robots of Star Wars and the engineered biological androids of Blade Runner—where Information Age culture and subjectivity were both reflected and constructed. Inside Technology series
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure
Larkin, B. (2013) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522 · Cited by 4,095
Quo vadis artificial intelligence?
Jiang, Y., Li, X., Luo, H., Yin, S., & Kaynak, O. (2022) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-022-00022-8 · Cited by 544
Digital Disaster, Cyber Security, and the Copenhagen School
Hansen, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2009) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00572.x · Cited by 530
`Nuts and Bolts and People': Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities
Faulkner, W. (2007) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312706072175 · Cited by 486
Algorithmic War: Everyday Geographies of the War on Terror
Amoore, L. (2009) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00655.x · Cited by 410
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, P. N.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1996-04-08
- OpenAlex
- W4253075065
- Cited by
- 999
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.36
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/1871.001.0001
- The paper
- Edwards, P. N. (1996). The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. The MIT Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1871.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.