Cited by 564Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionIncome, Poverty, and InequalityQuality of Life Measurement

Money and Happiness: Income and Subjective Well-Being Across Nations

Diener, Ed, Oishi, Shigehiro·2000·Culture and Subjective Well-Being

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/2242.003.0013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most research has revealed a small but discernible relationship between income and well-being.

    “Most of this work has revealed a small, but discernible, relationship between income and well-being (for reviews, see Clark, Frijters, & Shields, 2008; Diener & Biswas-Diener, 2002; Diener & Oishi, 2000).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diener, E., & Oishi, S.
Venue
Culture and Subjective Well-Being
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2000-09-15
Pages
185-218
OpenAlex
W4247919482
Cited by
564
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 27
FWCI
17.96
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
money and happiness, income, subjective well-being, cross-national comparison, happiness, economic growth and well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review