Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 736

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report

Nie, Norman H., Erbring, Lutz·2001·The Digital Divide

Abstract

[Editor's note: This study is based on data on a panel of households recruited as a random telephone sample of the U.S. population. In order to use the Internet for the purpose of efficient multi-channel data collection, each household in the sample--with or without prior Internet connection--was equipped with a WebTV® set-top box, with free Internet access and email accounts. The data for the study were collected in December 1999, from a national random sample of 4,113 individuals in 2,689 panel households. The margin of sampling error is about ±1.5% for results from the complete survey, and about ±2.5% for the subset of Internet users.]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/2419.003.0037

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Nie, N. H., & Erbring, L.
Venue
The Digital Divide
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2001-06-08
Pages
269-271
OpenAlex
W1800561057
Cited by
736
References
0
FWCI
150.24
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/2419.003.0037
The paper
Nie, N. H., & Erbring, L. (2001). Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. The Digital Divide. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2419.003.0037

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.