The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation
Abstract
This important study shows that an understanding of product differentiation is crucial to understanding how modern market economies function and that differentiated markets can be analyzed using discrete choice models of consumer behavior. Product differentiation - in quality, packaging, design, color, and style - has an important impact on consumer choice. It also provides a rich source of data that has been largely unexplored because there has been no generally accepted way to model the information available. This important study shows that an understanding of product differentiation is crucial to understanding how modern market economies function and that differentiated markets can be analyzed using discrete choice models of consumer behavior. It provides a valuable synthesis of existing, often highly technical work in both differentiated markets and discrete choice models and extends this work to establish a coherent theoretical underpinning for research in imperfect competition.The discrete choice approach provides an ideal framework for describing the demands for differentiated products and can be used for studying most product differentiation models in the literature. By introducing extra dimensions of product heterogeneity, the framework also provides richer models of firm location. Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation introduces students and researchers to the field, starting at the beginning and moving through to frontier research. The first four chapters detail the consumer-theoretic foundations underlying choice probability systems (including an overview of the main models used in the psychological theory of choice), while the next four chapters apply the probabilistic choice approach to oligopoly models of product differentiation, product selection, and location choice. The final chapter suggests various extensions of the models presented as well topics for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Technology, Geography, and Trade
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00352 · Cited by 4,485
Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook
Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2014) · Handbook of International Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3 · Cited by 1,565
Railroads and American Economic Growth: A “Market Access” Approach *
Donaldson, D., & Hornbeck, R. (2016) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjw002 · Cited by 1,238
A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets
Wilbur, K. C. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0303 · Cited by 342
Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Control of Substitute Products
Dong, L., Kouvelis, P., & Tian, Z. (2009) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.1080.0221 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, S. P., de Palma, A., & Thisse, J.-F.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1992-10-16
- OpenAlex
- W1966384122
- Cited by
- 2,324
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.94
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/2450.001.0001
- The paper
- Anderson, S. P., de Palma, A., & Thisse, J.-F. (1992). Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. The MIT Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2450.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.