The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions
Abstract
John Carroll shows how a pervasive but underused element of design practice, the scenario, can transform information systems design. Difficult to learn and awkward to use, today's information systems often change our activities in ways that we do not need or want. The problem lies in the software development process. In this book John Carroll shows how a pervasive but underused element of design practice, the scenario, can transform information systems design. Traditional textbook approaches manage the complexity of the design process via abstraction, treating design problems as if they were composites of puzzles. Scenario-based design uses concretization. A scenario is a concrete story about use. For example: "A person turned on a computer; the screen displayed a button labeled Start; the person used the mouse to select the button." Scenarios are a vocabulary for coordinating the central tasks of system development—understanding people's needs, envisioning new activities and technologies, designing effective systems and software, and drawing general lessons from systems as they are developed and used. Instead of designing software by listing requirements, functions, and code modules, the designer focuses first on the activities that need to be supported and then allows descriptions of those activities to drive everything else. In addition to a comprehensive discussion of the principles of scenario-based design, the book includes in-depth examples of its application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods
Friedman, B., Hendry, D. G., & Borning, A. (2017) · Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1561/1100000015 · Cited by 389
Finding and assessing social media information sources in the context of journalism
Diakopoulos, N., De Choudhury, M., & Naaman, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208409 · Cited by 221
Aoyama, M. (2005) · 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE'05) · doi:10.1109/re.2005.50 · Cited by 97
Aronoff-Spencer, E., McComsey, M., Chih, M.-Y., Hubenko, A., Baker, C., Kim, J., Ahern, D. K., Gibbons, M. C., Cafazzo, J. A., Nyakairu, P., et al. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/29492 · Cited by 27
Ostrowski, A. K., Harrington, C. N., Breazeal, C., & Park, H. W. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.716581 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Carroll, J. M.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2000-08-30
- OpenAlex
- W4248823373
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/4398.001.0001
- The paper
- Carroll, J. M. (2000). Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. The MIT Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4398.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.