Pushmi-pullyu Representations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If stigmergic traces have content at all, it is something like 'appropriate action'-a kind of irreducible mixture of indicative and prescriptive content.
“If they have content at all, it is something like 'appropriate action' - a kind of irreducible mixture of indicative and prescriptive content (perhaps analogous to Millikan's pushmi-pullyu representations (Millikan, 1996)).”
From Traces of thinking: a stigmergic approach to 4E cognition (2025) · cites this paper as Millikan, 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-6204 · Cited by 2,631 · see citing works
Traces of thinking: a stigmergic approach to 4E cognition
Sims, R. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05074-8 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Millikan, R. G.
- Corresponding author
- Millikan, Ruth Garrett
- Venue
- Mind and Morals
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1996-01-17
- Pages
- 155-172
- OpenAlex
- W4247629788
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 34.15
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
