The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Rapid Evaluation of Potential Fields in Particle Systems
Abstract
The Rapid Evaluation of Potential Fields in Particle Systems presents a group of algorithms for the computation of the potential and force fields in large-scale systems of particles that are likely to revolutionize a whole class of computer applications in science and engineering. In many areas of scientific computing, from studying the evolution of galaxies, to simulating the behavior of plasmas and fluids, to modelling chemical systems, a numerical scheme is used to follow the trajectories of a collection of particles moving in accordance with Newton's second law of motion in a field generated by the whole ensemble. Extending the earlier work of Rokhlin, Greengard has developed general, numerically stable methods for evaluating all pairwise interactions in linear time, a great improvement over the quadratic time required by the naive approach, and significantly better than any other proposed alternative. The "Rokhlin-Greengard" algorithm promises to make previously prohibitive simulations feasible, with speedups of three to four orders of magnitude in a system of a million particles. Moreover, the algorithm is well-suited for vector and parallel machines, and should make full use of their capabilities. The author presents his work with great clarity, and demonstrates the superiority of his methods both by mathematical analysis and by the results of numerical experiments. The Rapid Evaluation of Potential Fields in Particle Systems is a 1987 ACM Distinguished Dissertation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A smooth particle mesh Ewald method
Essmann, U., Perera, L., Berkowitz, M. L., Darden, T., Lee, H., & Pedersen, L. G. (1995) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.470117 · Cited by 22,514
Graph drawing by force‐directed placement
Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991) · Software: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.4380211102 · Cited by 6,352
The SPLASH-2 programs: characterization and methodological considerations
Woo, S. C., Ohara, M., Torrie, E., Singh, J. P., & Gupta, A. (1995) · Proceedings of the 22nd annual international symposium on Computer architecture - ISCA '95 · doi:10.1145/223982.223990 · Cited by 3,624
Continuous surface charge polarizable continuum models of solvation. I. General formalism
Scalmani, G., & Frisch, M. J. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3359469 · Cited by 2,716
Handbook of Global Optimization
(1995) · Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2025-2 · Cited by 1,628
Metadata
- Authors
- Greengard, L. F.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1988-04-07
- OpenAlex
- W2054557822
- Cited by
- 1,066
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Rapid Evaluation of Potential Fields in Particle Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/5750.001.0001
- The paper
- Greengard, L. F. (1988). The Rapid Evaluation of Potential Fields in Particle Systems. The MIT Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5750.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.