The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management
Abstract
In recent years, water resource management in the United States has begun a shift away from top-down, government agency-directed decision processes toward a collaborative approach of negotiation and problem solving. Rather than focusing on specific pollution sources or specific areas within a watershed, this new process considers the watershed as a whole, seeking solutions to an interrelated set of social, economic, and environmental problems. Decision making involves face-to-face negotiations among a variety of stakeholders, including federal, state, and local agencies, landowners, environmentalists, industries, and researchers. Swimming Upstream analyzes the collaborative approach by providing a historical overview of watershed management in the United States and a normative and empirical conceptual framework for understanding and evaluating the process. The bulk of the book looks at a variety of collaborative watershed planning projects across the country. It first examines the applications of relatively short-term collaborative strategies in Oklahoma and Texas, exploring issues of trust and legitimacy. It then analyzes factors affecting the success of relatively long-term collaborative partnerships in the National Estuary Program and in 76 watersheds in Washington and California. Bringing analytical rigor to a field that has been dominated by practitioners' descriptive accounts, Swimming Upstream makes a vital contribution to public policy, public administration, and environmental management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future
Fung, A. (2015) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12361 · Cited by 1,232
What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management?
Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x · Cited by 696
Expert‐Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis
Weible, C. M. (2008) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x · Cited by 470
Raymond, C. M., Singh, G. G., Benessaiah, K., Bernhardt, J. R., Levine, J., Nelson, H., Turner, N. J., Norton, B., Tam, J., & Chan, K. M. A. (2013) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7 · Cited by 335
Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour
Mills, J., Gaskell, P., Ingram, J., Dwyer, J., Reed, M., & Short, C. (2017) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9705-4 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2005-04-29
- OpenAlex
- W4243401642
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.48
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/6577.001.0001
- The paper
- Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management. (2005). The MIT Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6577.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.