The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Combining Local Context and WordNet Similarity for Word Sense Identification
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Introducfion, Training and Testing Data, Experiment 1: The Local Context Classifier, Experiment 2: Measuring Word Similarity In Wordnet, Experiment 3: Combining Local Context and Wordnet Similarity Measures, Conclusions, References
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evaluating WordNet-based Measures of Lexical Semantic Relatedness
Budanitsky, A., & Hirst, G. (2006) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/089120106776173093 · Cited by 1,448
SemEval-2014 Task 10: Multilingual Semantic Textual Similarity
Agirre, E., Banea, C., Cardie, C., Cer, D., Diab, M., Gonzalez-Agirre, A., Guo, W., Mihalcea, R., Rigau, G., & Wiebe, J. (2014) · Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014) · doi:10.3115/v1/s14-2010 · Cited by 490
Medelyan, O., Milne, D., Legg, C., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.05.004 · Cited by 357
A survey of ontology learning techniques and applications
Asim, M. N., Wasim, M., Khan, M. U. G., Mahmood, W., & Abbasi, H. M. (2018) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/bay101 · Cited by 258
Exploiting semantic role labeling, WordNet and Wikipedia for coreference resolution
Ponzetto, S. P., & Strube, M. (2006) · Proceedings of the main conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics - · doi:10.3115/1220835.1220860 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Leacock, C.
- Venue
- WordNet
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1998-05-22
- Pages
- 265-284
- OpenAlex
- W2534712034
- Cited by
- 1,662
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining Local Context and WordNet Similarity for Word Sense Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/7287.003.0018
- The paper
- Leacock, C. (1998). Combining Local Context and WordNet Similarity for Word Sense Identification. WordNet. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7287.003.0018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
